 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| C.D.C. v. State, CR-00-0067,
COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, August 31, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Marijuana possession and distribution convictions affirmed where defendant was ineligible for drug court, he failed to satisfy elements of an entrapment defense, and was arrested as part of a multi-jurisdictional task force.
|
|||||
| C.G. v. State, CR-00-0590,
COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, August 31, 2001, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Despite fact defendant was not present at time her daughter was sexually abused by the child's father, defendant knew, or should have known, that there was a probability the father would sexually abuse the child in defendant's absence.
|
|||||
| Cannon v. Cannon, 2000720,
COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, August 31, 2001, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court abused its discretion in dismissing action for want of prosecution. Certain form was not required under the child support guidelines as trial court had documentation to either enforce obligation or set case for final hearing.
|
|||||
| Carter v. State, CR-98-1976,
COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, August 31, 2001, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court erred by failing to reconcile the jury's inconsistent findings concerning defendant's intent and allowing murder and manslaughter convictions to stand under the doctrine of transferred intent.
|
|||||
| Carter v. State, CR-99-0474,
COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, August 31, 2001, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court correctly advised defendant of range of punishment but failed to advise him of mandatory fines due to be imposed upon entry of guilty plea; failure to inform defendant of mandatory fines prior to entry of plea was reversible error.
|
|||||
| Centobie v. State, CR-98-2056,
COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, August 31, 2001, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant knowingly and voluntarily waived his Miranda rights. Thus, motion to suppress his confession was properly denied. Also, death sentence was not disproportionate or excessive. Thus, capital murder conviction and sentence were affirmed.
|
|||||
| Cloyne v. State, CR-00-0424,
COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, August 31, 2001, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| D.A.R. v. State, CR-00-0740,
COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, August 31, 2001, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Juvenile court erred by imposing restitution obligation upon juvenile where order was entered after he turned 21 years of age, because the juvenile court no longer retained jurisdiction over the matter.
|
|||||
| Davis v. State, CR-00-1050,
COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, August 31, 2001, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Order revoking probation was inadequate as trial court had not stated evidence relied on and reasons for revoking probation. Case was remanded to trial court for entry of proper order.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
