 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| State v. Lupo, 1050224,
SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA, October 12, 2007, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court properly found that the Alabama Interior Design Consumer Protection Act, Ala. Code § 34-15B-1 et seq. (Act), violated Ala. Const. art. I, §§ 6 and 13; Act was overly broad, unreasonable, and vague, as it regulated recommendations unregistered individual could make while allowing unregistered person to do so pursuant to a retail sale.
|
|||||
| Walls v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 1050205,
SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA, October 12, 2007, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Judgment as a matter of law in intentional interference with a business relationship suit brought against insurer and agent by law firm and lawyer was error because evidence of agent's conversation with client, before client terminated the lawyer's employment, was substantial evidence under Ala. Code § 12-21-12, requiring jury resolution.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
