 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| J.F. v. D.C.W., 2030133,
COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, August 27, 2004, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court's judgment was reversed where transcript showed that it was inconsistent with a settlement agreement on a father's visitation rights and as no evidence was presented to the trial court relating to the visitation issue.
|
|||||
| Kirby v. State, 1030128,
SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA, August 27, 2004, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court erred in declaring legislation unconstitutional because statute allowed for retroactive reevaluation of defendant's sentence after he was sentenced to life imprisonment as habitual felony offender; matter was remanded for resentencing.
|
|||||
| Lee v. State, CR-02-1900,
COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, August 27, 2004, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Residency requirement of Alabama Community Notification Act (CNA) did not violate the Ex Post Facto Clause as defendant failed to show that effects of the CNA negated Alabama legislature's intention to protect public from convicted sex offenders.
|
|||||
| Lindsey v. State, CR-03-0592,
COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, August 27, 2004, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Officer's belief that defendant was under the influence justified a stop. Probable cause and exigent circumstances thereafter existed to support his decision to have defendant's stomach pumped after defendant swallowed cocaine.
|
|||||
| Luster v. State, CR-03-1065,
COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, August 27, 2004, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: As the record of disciplinary proceedings indicated only that witnesses the inmate wanted to call were "not available," the case was remanded for findings as to the reasons for such unavailability and whether the inmate was afforded due process.
|
|||||
| McAdory v. State, CR-02-2174,
COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, August 27, 2004, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court erred in admitting defendant's prior drug convictions, as said evidence was used for no other purpose but to show that his actions in the present case were in conformity with his actions in those cases. Also, said error was not harmless.
|
|||||
| McKelvey v. State, CR-03-0510,
COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, August 27, 2004, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant could not be convicted of reckless endangerment, as a lesser included offense of first-degree animal cruelty, as the latter was not broad enough to encompass the former.
|
|||||
| Minor v. State, CR-00-1300,
COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, August 27, 2004, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's conviction and death sentence for capital murder of a child less than 14 years of age was affirmed; there was no evidence that the sentence was imposed under the influence of passion, prejudice, or any other arbitrary factor.
|
|||||
| Montgomery v. State, CR-03-1206,
COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, August 27, 2004, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Dismissal of inmate's postconviction petition as time-barred was error, as he sufficiently alleged that court had lacked jurisdiction to accept his guilty plea to second-degree robbery because he could not have consented to amendment of indictment.
|
|||||
| Morrow v. State, CR-01-1619,
COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, August 27, 2004, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where evidence in a capital punishment action raised an inference of defendant's mental retardation, and the trial court rejected the jury's recommendation of life in prison without parole, remand was ordered to reweigh the evidence presented.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
