 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Parris v. State, CR-00-0406,
COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, August 31, 2001, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court was directed to determine exact reasons for 40 month delay in bringing defendant to trial for attempted murder and apply balancing test to determine if defendant was deprived of constitutional right to speedy trial.
|
|||||
| Peterson v. State, CR-00-1417,
COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, August 31, 2001, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant contended that his convictions for both felony-murder and first-degree robbery violated double jeopardy principles. Defendant's double jeopardy claim could be meritorious. Thus, case was remanded to circuit court.
|
|||||
| Poole v. State, CR-99-1200,
COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, August 31, 2001, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Controlled substance distribution sentence enhancement due to crime location had to be proved to jury beyond reasonable doubt but did not have to be charged in indictment, although defendant had to be notified of sentence enhancement request.
|
|||||
| Pruitt v. State, CR-00-1013,
COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, August 31, 2001, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: As prison's manual created a liberty interest in an inmate's continued participation in work release, defendant, whose punishment for violating prison rules was removal from work release, was entitled to a review of his due-process claims.
|
|||||
| R.S.C. v. J.B.C., 2990943,
COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, August 31, 2001, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Grandparent visitation statutes, including presumption favoring such visitation, violated parents' fundamental liberty interest in deciding children's associations, and state had no compelling interest in choosing whether to allow visitation.
|
|||||
| Ramsey v. O'Neal, 1000960,
SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA, August 31, 2001, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court erred in requiring property owners in boundary dispute to execute quitclaim deeds to establish new boundary line. Court's role was to fix existing line, not create new one.
|
|||||
| Regino v. State, CR-00-0791,
COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, August 31, 2001, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Reynolds v. Sheppard, 1000867,
SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA, August 31, 2001, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The patient did not request that service of her medical-malpractice action be withheld and she paid her filing fee within the limitations period. Thus, the trial court erred in granting the defendants' motion to dismiss.
|
|||||
| Ridlespurge v. Kmart Corp., 2990410,
COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, August 31, 2001, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
