 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Ala. DOT v. Williams, 1060619,
SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA, October 19, 2007, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The Supreme Court of Alabama declared that Ala. Code ¿ 18-1A-211(a) established the rate of postjudgment interest applicable in an eminent domain case, therefore, a trial court erred in computing postjudgment interest at a different rate and the case was remanded for entry of a postjudgment interest award of 3.28 percent as just compensation.
|
|||||
| Associated Gen. Contrs. Workers Comp. Self Ins. Fund v. Williams, 2060285,
COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, October 19, 2007, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because an employee's employment was not principally localized in Alabama, he was not entitled to workers' compensation benefits under Alabama law. Thus, the trial court erred in summarily denying the self-insurance fund's claim for reimbursement of the advance payments made to the employee relating to the employer's potential liability.
|
|||||
| Cole v. Riley, 1050662,
SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA, October 19, 2007, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court properly granted summary judgment to state officials on nonprofit organization members' claim that offering driver's license exams in multiple languages violated Ala. Const. art. I, ¿ 36.01 making English Alabama's official language; no showing was made that doing so failed to preserve and enhance English as Alabama's common language.
|
|||||
| Ex parte Sorsby, 1050636,
SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA, October 19, 2007, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The dismissal of defendant's appeal of his guilty plea to driving under the influence was in error as Ala. R. Crim. P. 30.1 did not limit the right to appeal a district court's judgment to the circuit court for a trial de novo following a guilty plea despite defendant not reserving any issue for appeal and not filing to withdraw his guilty plea.
|
|||||
| New Gourmet Concepts, Inc. v. Siedo Invs. Co., L.L.C., 1060442, 1060473,
SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA, October 19, 2007, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Finding that subtenants were not entitled to share in condemnation proceeds university paid to lessor, and which lessor shared with lessee, was error; lease was ambiguous about effect total taking of property would have on lease, meant lease did not automatically terminate upon taking, and compelled conclusion subtenants could share in proceeds.
|
|||||
| Stonebrook Dev., L.L.C. v. Matthews Bros. Constr. Co., 2060419,
COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, October 19, 2007, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: There was sufficient evidence that contract's clause, allowing developer liquidated damages of one-half of one percent of total contract price ($ 1097) for each day of delay of clause, was reasonable estimate of the probable loss. But as damages awarded was not multiple of $ 1097, damages had to be recalculated.
|
|||||
| T.R. v. R.C., 2060443,
COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, October 19, 2007, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
