 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Sizemore v. State, CR-01-1042,
COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, September 27, 2002, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The trial court did not err in denying defendant's motion to dismiss since the traffic tickets were not void on their face; by giving a false name and other false information, defendant elevated his actions to forgery.
|
|||||
| Smith v. State, CR-01-1223,
COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, September 27, 2002, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's claims on appeal of revocation of her probation were not preserved. The trial court properly stated its reasons for revoking probation, but a statement of the evidence it relied on was required.
|
|||||
| Taylor v. State, CR-01-0834,
COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, September 27, 2002, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because the circuit court failed to advise defendant that he could be ordered to serve consecutive sentences prior to accepting his guilty plea, the plea was not knowingly and voluntarily entered, requiring reversal and remand.
|
|||||
| Trapp v. Vess, 1011406,
SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA, September 27, 2002, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Person injured when helping remove a motorist's car from a ditch did not show the rescue doctrine applied to his situation, as he had no reasonable belief that someone was in peril, and he did not show the motorist was negligent.
|
|||||
| V.R. v. State, CR-01-0334,
COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, September 27, 2002, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant was not required to raise a general ineffective assistance of trial counsel claim in a motion for a new trial, where he had not received the trial transcript, in order to preserve the issue for a postconviction motion.
|
|||||
| Woodard v. Funderburk, 2010451,
COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, September 27, 2002, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The trial court erred in imposing a lien on the real estate in favor of the executrix of a decedent's estate in order to recover for child support arrears; the owner of the property was not the executrix's debtor at the time of a transfer.
|
|||||
| Woodard v. State, CR-00-1625,
COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, September 27, 2002, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where jury was erroneously allowed to hear that defendant admitted to killing a man previously, but was not informed that that he had not been indicted for the killing or that he said the killing was in self-defense, he was granted new trial.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
