LexisNexis
  
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!

Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!

While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.


   State Courts - Alabama - October 4, 2002

  
Gibbs v. State Dep't of Indus. Rels., 2990424, COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, October 4, 2002, Released
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Lewis v. Oakley, 1001847, SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA, October 4, 2002, Released
View this case - free  

Overview: As the "transaction" evidenced by a stockbroker's execution of a Form U-4 had a substantial effect on interstate commerce, a provision in the form that mandated arbitration of disputes between members of the NYSE was enforceable in Alabama.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Parsons v. Aaron, 1002086, 1002087, 1010105, SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA, October 4, 2002, Released
View this case - free  

Overview: Where father's unilateral business decisions made on behalf of his son's corporation were ratified by son, father was not third party to contract between corporation and seller; thus, seller's tortious interference claim against father failed.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
S.D.C. v. N.L., 2010746, COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, October 4, 2002, Released
View this case - free  

Overview: Mother's notice of appeal of court orders relating to father's paternity was filed well beyond the 14-day limit from the date of the entry of the judgment or order appealed from, as required by statute. The appeal was dismissed.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Sessions v. Espy, 1010329, SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA, October 4, 2002, Released
View this case - free  

Overview: As bankrupt corporation's legal malpractice claim against its bankruptcy attorney was property of bankruptcy estate, corporation could not maintain its independent malpractice suit against attorney without permission of Chapter 7 trustee.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Sherman Int'l Corp. v. Summit Gen. Contrs., 2010331, COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, October 4, 2002, Released
View this case - free  

Overview: Forgery was not an affirmative defense. Thus, individuals preserved their right to assert forgery as a defense in their summary judgment motions and on appeal, despite providing general denials in their answers.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Sprinkle v. Edwards, 1010199, SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA, October 4, 2002, Released
View this case - free  

Overview: Minor's state court action after collision with deputy's vehicle was properly barred by the res judicata effect of a prior federal district court dismissal of all of the minor's claims.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
State v. Tenaska Ala. Ptnrs., L.P., 2010328, COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, October 4, 2002, Released
View this case - free  

Overview: Electric wholesale generator company was not a utility for purposes of the ad valorem tax, where it was not obligated to serve the public, had no power of eminent domain, and was not subject to rate or other regulation.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Back to Top
  

 www.lexisnexis.com  |  About LexisNexis  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Customer Support  |  Contact Us
  Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.