 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Akins Funeral Home, Inc. v. Miller, 1020198, 1020224,
SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA, September 26, 2003, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Consultant with an extensive education in the field of grief counseling and in the traumatic effects induced by loss was properly permitted to testify as an expert witness. Compensatory and punitive damages awards were upheld.
|
|||||
| Allen v. Stephens, 2020363,
COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, September 26, 2003, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Liability of landlord, for renting premises in dangerous condition constituting nuisance, did not exist in favor of tenant, servants, guests, or others entering under tenant's title, and owners were only liable for known and concealed latent defects.
|
|||||
| Anderson v. State, CR-02-0181,
COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, September 26, 2003, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Although defendant's prior manslaughter conviction was relevant and admissible to prove a pistol possession charge, it was not relevant to prove an assault charge; thus, consolidation of the charges prevented a fair assault trial.
|
|||||
| Auburn Med. Ctr., Inc. v. E. Ala. Health Care Auth., 2010786, 2010787,
COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, September 26, 2003, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where legislation enacted after appeals were filed rendered the issues raised moot, a decision for either party would not affect whether a health authority could purchase an MRI machine; therefore, the appeals were dismissed.
|
|||||
| B.S.L. v. S.E., 2020569,
COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, September 26, 2003, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where a mother recognized her drug and alcohol problem, voluntarily sought treatment, and was successful in her recovery for two years, the father failed to satisfy his burden of proof to support a modification of custody.
|
|||||
| Benton v. State, CR-02-1152,
COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, September 26, 2003, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where the circuit court failed to sufficiently state the reasons it relied upon in revoking a probationer's term of probation, and failed to state that it was satisfied that a pending charge against him was true, remand was ordered.
|
|||||
| Berryman v. Adams, 2010991,
COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, September 26, 2003, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: When divorce order required decedent's life insurance for his children, a constructive trust could not be imposed on benefits paid as order did not identify a specific policy and children's vested interest and unjust enrichment were not shown.
|
|||||
| Boyd v. State, CR-02-0037,
COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, September 26, 2003, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Postconviction procedural bars applied equally to death penalty cases, and appellate court only considered denial of original postconviction petition, not amended petition, where no objection was raised below to failure to rule on amended petition.
|
|||||
| Bradley v. Miller, 1012133,
SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA, September 26, 2003, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where a medical expert's testimony with respect to the issue of causation in a patient's medical malpractice action was based on pure speculation, such did not create a genuine issue of material fact; summary judgment for the doctor was proper.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
