 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Ex parte Staggs, 1001260,
SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA, September 14, 2001, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because the Alabama Supreme Court was persuaded that the trial court's findings of fact and its resulting judgment were supported by substantial evidence, the Alabama Court of Civil Appeals erred in reversing the judgment.
|
|||||
| Ex parte Thomas, CR-00-2444,
COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, September 14, 2001, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Bail could be set higher than amount recommended in rule of criminal procedure but circuit court was directed to state reasons for refusal to lower $ 1,000,000 bail set on three counts of felony murder.
|
|||||
| GMC v. Jackson, 2000567,
COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, September 14, 2001, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In workers' compensation case, employee had not fully recovered from previous injuries at time of later injuries, so trial court erred in failing to determine the degree of injury that would have resulted had previous injuries not existed.
|
|||||
| Gibbons v. Ala. Ethics Comm'n, 2000358,
COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, September 14, 2001, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Courts lacked jurisdiction to hear appeal of action of ethics commission finding of probable cause that college professor misused intramural funds and recommending criminal prosecution as administrative action was not taken in contested case.
|
|||||
| Gilbert v. James Russell Motors, Inc., 2000434,
COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, September 14, 2001, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court improperly pierced corporate veil where there was no evidence that corporation was undercapitalized or a sham, or that shareholders operated corporation as an alter ego or instrumentality of themselves.
|
|||||
| Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. Snell, 2991241,
COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, September 14, 2001, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Even though medical evidence regarding causation of former employee's back injury was conflicting, the trial court's finding that the injury was causally related to workplace injury was supported by substantial evidence and would not be reversed.
|
|||||
| Green Tree Fin. Corp. v. Lewis, 1000731,
SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA, September 14, 2001, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Denial of motion to compel arbitration was reversed because home owner's installment contract's arbitration clause stated that it was governed by Federal Arbitration Act and homeowners expressly agreed to make their payments to assignee.
|
|||||
| Hinton v. Monsanto Co., 1000599,
SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA, September 14, 2001, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Alabama law did not recognize a cause of action for medical monitoring. Minor did not allege a cause of action under Alabama's long-standing tort law and it would not be expanded to include medical monitoring.
|
|||||
| Meyer v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 1000905,
SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA, September 14, 2001, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Judgment for store in customer's suit against it for employee's in-store assault and battery of her was affirmed. Customer was not entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Jury found that employee was not acting within scope of her employment.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
