Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!

Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!

   State Courts - Alabama - September 17, 2004

  
Beal Bank, SSB v. Schilleci, 1021223, SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA, September 17, 2004, Released ** Note from the reporter of decisions: This opinion was released by the Supreme Court under the date September 17, 2004. This case was actually released to the public on September 20, 2004.
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free

  
Ex parte DaimlerChrysler Corp., 1030573, 1030574, 1030575, 1030576, 1030577, 1030579, 1030589, SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA, September 17, 2004, Released ** Note from the reporter of decisions: This opinion was released by the Supreme Court under the date September 17, 2004. This case was actually released to the public on September 20, 2004.
View this case - free  

Overview: Petitioning parties in four separate actions were denied mandamus relief seeking dismissal of the actions filed in Alabama, so that they could be filed in Georgia, where they failed to show that the Alabama court was an inconvenient forum.

Search Cases for Free

  
Ex parte Harrelson, 1031596, SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA, September 17, 2004, Released ** Note from the reporter of decisions: This opinion was released by the Supreme Court under the date September 17, 2004. This case was actually released to the public on September 20, 2004.
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free

  
Ziva Jewelry, Inc. v. Car Wash Headquarters, Inc., 1030941, SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA, September 17, 2004, Released ** Note from the reporter of decisions: This opinion was released by the Supreme Court under the date September 17, 2004. This case was actually released to the public on September 20, 2004.
View this case - free  

Overview: Car wash operator was entitled to summary judgment against a jewelry wholesaler, where no bailment as to jewelry hidden inside a salesman's trunk existed, and a third party's criminal act was an intervening act which caused the wholesaler's loss.

Search Cases for Free

  
Back to Top