LexisNexis
  
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!

Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!

While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.


   State Courts - Alabama - November 7, 2008

  
Ala. Dep't of Revenue v. Nat'l Peanut Festival Ass'n, 2070123, COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, November 7, 2008, Released
View this case - free  

Overview: Decision that taxpayer was exempt from all taxes was reversed. Although Ala. Code § 40-9-1(12) exempted taxpayer from paying sales taxes on receipts of the sale of admission tickets to events that were purely agricultural in nature, receipts from concerts and beauty pageants unrelated to agriculture were subject to Ala. Code § 40-23-2 license tax.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
City of Dothan v. McCleskey, 2070536, COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, November 7, 2008, Released
View this case - free  

Overview: Because there was substantial evidence before a city personnel board indicating that an employee committed an intolerable offense by submitting a fraudulent-reimbursement claim, the employee's termination was properly affirmed by the board; therefore, the circuit court improperly reversed the board's decision.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
D.L.L. v. B.J., 2070891, COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, November 7, 2008, Released
View this case - free  

Overview: Because a father's notice of appeal was filed one day late, it was untimely; therefore, his appeal of the denial of his Ala. R. Civ. P. 60(b)(4) motion for relief from a judgment awarding custody of his minor child to the maternal grandparents was dismissed.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Dabbs v. Four Tees, Inc., 2070630, 2070631, and 2070632, COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, November 7, 2008, Released
View this case - free  

Overview: Ala. Code § 34-8-1 barred contractor's breach of contract damages; noncompliance with licensure requirement rendered oral contract null and void. Statute was not circumvented by having owners make checks payable to suppliers where contractor controlled purchases. Ala. Code § 6-5-211 slander of title claim was not supported by evidence of malice.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Ex parte McCall, 1070633, SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA, November 7, 2008, Released
View this case - free  

Overview: Trial court's failure to issue specific fact findings as to material issues presented in inmate's postconviction relief petition was grounds for reversal because, by holding evidentiary hearing, trial court implicitly found that issues presented were material, and, under Ala. R. Crim. P. 32.9(d), trial court was obligated to make fact findings.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Hammock v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 1070939, SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA, November 7, 2008, Released
View this case - free  

Overview: Because an executor's respondeat superior and negligent supervision and training claims were based on an employment relationship, they were intertwined; accordingly, the trial court erred in certifying its summary judgment on the claim of respondeat superior as final pursuant to Ala. R. Civ. P. 54(b), Ala. Code § 12-22-2.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Holt v. Lauderdale County, 1050740, SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA, November 7, 2008, Released
View this case - free  

Overview: Summary judgment in favor of county was error because county had a duty under Ala. Code § 23-1-80 and common law to keep bridge and roadway in a reasonably safe condition and because material fact issue remained as to whether county had constructive notice that the area was unsafe without the installation of a guard rail.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Humber v. Bjornson, 2061076, COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, November 7, 2008, Released
View this case - free  

Overview: The trial court properly enforced the parties' informal agreement concerning a vehicle as a provision of their divorce judgment. The former wife effectively offered to give the vehicle to the former husband, and he tacitly accepted the offer by taking possession of the vehicle, paying the indebtedness on the vehicle, and insuring it.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
J.B. v. DeKalb County Dep't of Human Res., 2070570, COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, November 7, 2008, Released
View this case - free  

Overview: A judgment terminating the parental rights of a father, an illegal immigrant, pursuant to Ala. Code § 26-18-7, was reversed. The trial court erred in finding that he had abandoned his children during a period when he was in Guatemala, considering the arrangements he had made for their care before leaving for Guatemala, and other circumstances.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
L.A.C. v. T.S.C., 2070313, COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, November 7, 2008, Released
View this case - free  

Overview: Writ of mandamus directed trial court to grant habeas petition; trial court removed children from mother without entering Ala. R. Civ. P. 58 order; conducting Ala. Code §§ 12-15-60, 12-15-153 hearing; or finding that she was unfit. Ala. Code § 12-15-1(10) dependency was not shown by Ala. Code §§ 6-11-20, 12-15-65(f) clear and convincing evidence.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Back to Top
  

 www.lexisnexis.com  |  About LexisNexis  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Customer Support  |  Contact Us
  Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.