 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Bishop State Cmty. College v. Thomas, 2070660,
COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, November 21, 2008, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Substantial evidence supported a hearing officer's decision that a college employee was not "overall ineffective" in doing his job, but this did not bar his termination under Ala. Code § 36-26-102 due to a felony conviction and impeachment, as "other good or just cause" meant any cause reasonably related to his fitness or capacity to do his job.
|
|||||
| Boudreau v. Slaton, 2070647,
COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, November 21, 2008, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Judgment was affirmed as order forever divorcing parties that did not determine property division issues was not final. Divorce action abated upon husband's death. No exception to law of abatement allowing for separable finality of divorce judgments was created. Will executed by husband after entry of divorce order was not revoked.
|
|||||
| D.C.L. v. Marion County Dep't of Human Res., 2070863,
COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, November 21, 2008, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Denial of father's motion to adjudicate paternity based on his failure to comply with Putative Father Registry Act, Ala. Code § 26-10C-1, was error because that act applied in adoptions, and failure to comply with it was not a ground either for terminating a parental rights or for refusing to decide paternity under Uniform Parentage Act.
|
|||||
| Ex parte Davis, 1060734,
SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA, November 21, 2008, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Ex parte State, 1070536,
SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA, November 21, 2008, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Fenn v. Ozark City Schs. Bd. of Educ., 1070821,
SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA, November 21, 2008, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Howard v. Allstate Ins. Co., 1071215,
SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA, November 21, 2008, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because common issues were intertwined in the parents' claims against a driver, his house mate, the insured, the insured's brother, the insured's company, and the insurer, the trial court erred in certifying the summary judgments against the insured, the insured's brother, the insured's company, and the insurer as final under Ala. R. Civ. P. 54(b).
|
|||||
| Jarrett v. Ala. Dep't of Indus. Rels., 2070624,
COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, November 21, 2008, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Summary judgment for former employer in former employee's appeal of denial of unemployment claim was error because, based on competing affidavits, a material fact dispute existed as to whether former employee's attempt to rescind his resignation was accepted, and thus whether he voluntarily left his employment pursuant to Ala. Code § 25-4-78(2).
|
|||||
| Johnson v. Strain, 1071028,
SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA, November 21, 2008, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because the tenants unambiguously requested a hearing, the trial court erred in not affording them an opportunity to be heard on their Ala. R. Civ. P. 59(g) motion for a new trial; consequently, the judgment denying their motion for a new trial could not be affirmed based on the harmless-error rule.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
