 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| State Dep't of Indus. Rels. v. Campbell, 2070477,
COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, December 5, 2008, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court erred in awarding unemployment benefits because worker presented no evidence or argument that her addiction or her need for rehabilitation was "connected" to her employment such that it was "good cause" for voluntarily leaving her employment to enter a treatment program, and failed to satisfy Ala. Code § 25-4-78(2)a.1. exception.
|
|||||
| Thibodeau v. Thibodeau, 2070924,
COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, December 5, 2008, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because the trial court's judgment denying the husband's motion to set aside a default judgment did not state that the trial court considered the factors set out in Kirtland in reaching its decision, the judgment was reversed and the matter was remanded with instructions to consider the Kirtland factors.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
