LexisNexis
  

Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!

Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!

While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.


   State Courts - Alabama - December 15, 2006

  
Lorren v. Agan, 2050520, COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, December 15, 2006, Released
View this case - free  

Overview: Trial court erred in granting judgment as a matter of law pursuant to Ala. R. Civ. P. 50(a)(2) to the prior marriage children on widow's claim that she was in a common law marriage with the husband; evidence existed to show the husband did agree to engage in a marital relationship with the widow, and, thus, a new trial was required on that claim.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Maxwell v. Dawkins, 1051443, SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA, December 15, 2006, Released
View this case - free  

Overview: Where testator's attorney wrote on will, "I hereby revoke this last will," and testator signed his name below that sentence, the revocation language plus the physical act of testator's signing his name revoked will under Ala. Code § 43-8-136(b). As testator performed the physical act of revocation, it did not have to be observed by two witnesses.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Medical Servs., LLC v. GMW & Co., 1041753, 1041762, SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA, December 15, 2006, Released
View this case - free  

Overview: To the extent owner's complaint sought damages against a contractor's president in his capacity as "architect," those claims were excluded from arbitration by contractor and owner's contract. However, to extent claims were essentially claims against president as contractor's employee, they had to be arbitrated, as contract did not excluded them.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Pirtle v. Tucker, 1050907, SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA, December 15, 2006, Released
View this case - free  

Overview: Two granddaughters, contesting their grandfather's will, failed to show a lack of testamentary capacity or a failure to properly execute but were successful in reversing summary judgment in favor of the will proponent as to their undue influence claim as they established that the proponent, a neighbor to the testator, was a favored beneficiary.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Porter v. Black Warrior Farms, L.L.C., 1050566, SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA, December 15, 2006, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: Letter from decedent to son referring to money earlier transferred to son did not qualify as a will under Ala. Code § 43-8-131 because there were no witnesses to decedent's signature. Letter was, at most, either a gift conditioned on decedent's failure to return from upcoming cruise or a gift causa mortis that became void when she returned.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Thomas v. Campbell, 2050374, COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, December 15, 2006, Released
View this case - free  

Overview: Though a father's daughter had married, since her marriage was annulled, the trial court properly deemed her not to be emancipated; therefore, it properly ordered the father to continue to pay the child's postminority educational expenses pursuant to his agreement with the child's mother.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Washington v. Hill, 1050586, SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA, December 15, 2006, Released
View this case - free  

Overview: Candidate met jurisdictional requirements of Ala. Code § 11-46-69(a) to contest mayoral election because she was not required to specifically state that she was a qualified elector, a signed notarized statement was sufficient evidence that she possessed that status, and she made good faith effort to timely file security under Ala. Code § 17-15-29.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Back to Top
  

  www.lexisnexis.com |  About LexisNexis |  Terms & Conditions |  Customer Support |  Sitemap |  Contact Us
  CopyrightŠ 2008  LexisNexis®  All rights reserved.