 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Langham v. Wampol, 2030322,
COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS OF ALABAMA, December 3, 2004, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Summary judgment was vacated as to parents' individual claims against individual for malicious prosecution of their son and appeal was dismissed as parents lacked standing to bring their individual claims since they were not subject of prosecution.
|
|||||
| Leeman v. Cook's Pest Control, Inc., 1022063,
SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA, December 3, 2004, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where home buyers failed to show that an arbitration clause in a termite inspection agreement was unconscionable, that such created a contract of adhesion, or that the costs associated with such were excessive, said clause was properly enforced.
|
|||||
| Lifestar Response of Ala., Inc. v. Lemuel, 1022072,
SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA, December 3, 2004, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Ambulance company failed to show that it had a meritorious defense and that no prejudice would result if it were to have received an order setting aside a default judgment entered against it. Further, a punitive damages award was not excessive.
|
|||||
| Saia Food Distribs. & Club, Inc. v. SecurityLink from Ameritech, Inc., 1031127,
SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA, December 3, 2004, Released
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Limitation-of-liability provision in security company's contract with night club owner was valid; thus maximum that owner of burglarized and burned club could recover from company in breach of contract suit was amount it spent on company's equipment.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
