 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Reyes v. State, Court of Appeals No. A-7337, No. 4195,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, March 22, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: On appeal of a sentence contending it was excessive, the judgment was affirmed, because given the aggravating circumstances of the case, the judge was not clearly mistaken when he sentenced defendant.
|
|||||
| State v. Oxereok, Court of Appeals No. A-7197, No. 4194,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, March 22, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: On the State's appeal of a domestic violence case where the offender was allowed to return to the residence of his victim, the order was reversed because it contradicted the statute pertaining to domestic violence cases.
|
|||||
| Swett v. Municipality of Anchorage, Court of Appeals No. A-7265, No. 4193,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, March 22, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Appellant's right to consult with an attorney was not violated where a police officer had to hold the telephone to appellant's ear under the circumstances because defendant was handcuffed for officer safety in sub-station.
|
|||||
| Jerrel v. State, Supreme Court No. S-8436, No. 5254,
SUPREME COURT OF ALASKA, March 24, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Regulation not adopted in accordance with administrative procedures was invalid. Indicia of regulation were: it implemented or interpreted law administered by agency, and affected or was used in dealing with the public.
|
|||||
| Higgins v. State, Court of Appeals No. A-7222, No. 4196,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, March 29, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: State filed a formal request for restitution. Defendant did not respond to State's pleading. He never requested a hearing. He was entitled to contest the amount of restitution, but he abandoned that right through inaction.
|
|||||
| Risinger v. State, Court of Appeals No. A-7263, No. 4197,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, March 29, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A trial court amending sentence on remand was not required to hold second sentencing hearing where defendant received full and fair hearing the first time.
|
|||||
| Adams v. State, Court of Appeals No. A-7355, No. 4201,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, April 5, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The trial court's revocation of appellant's probation and imposition of suspended term of imprisonment was affirmed, because the trial court evaluated the relevant circumstances before imposing the sentence on appellant.
|
|||||
| Kushida v. State, Court of Appeals No. A-7267, No. 4200,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, April 5, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The trial judge correctly found that aggravator Alaska Stat. § 12.55.155(c)(10) applied to appellant's no contest plea to attempted sexual abuse of a minor, where the finding was based on substantial evidence.
|
|||||
| Midgett v. State, Court of Appeals No. A-7191, No. 4199,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, April 5, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The judgment of the trial court was reversed, because appellant was improperly denied the opportunity to cross-examine the teenage girl whom he allegedly sexually assaulted, as girl may have been biased.
|
|||||
| Shaw v. State, Court of Appeals Nos. A-7155, A-7156, No. 4198,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, April 5, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: When the evidence was viewed in the light most favorable to upholding lower court's decision, the evidence supported revocation of defendant's probation for contacting an individual who had a restraining order against him.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
