 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Champion v. State, Court of Appeals No. A-6985, No. 4161,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, December 8, 1999, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Appellant's conviction was valid despite exculpatory evidence not presented to grand jury as indictment would have been sufficient without improper evidence, and as police did not have duty to find all exculpatory evidence.
|
|||||
| Forshee v. State, Court of Appeals No. A-7007, No. 4157,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, December 8, 1999, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Appellant's taking a vehicle from a car dealership for a test drive and not returning did not constitute first-degree vehicle theft under Alaska law. The court reversed appellant's conviction. This was a memorandum opinion.
|
|||||
| Guevarra v. State, Court of Appeals No. A-7270, No. 4159,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, December 8, 1999, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial judge's finding of aggravating factor, that defendant's conduct constituting first degree assault was among most serious within the definition of the offense, and of no mitigating factors, was not clearly erroneous.
|
|||||
| Hiller v. State, Court of Appeals No. A-6877, No. 4155,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, December 8, 1999, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Conviction for second-degree theft vacated because the State failed to prove sufficient value on second-degree theft. Trial court's decision to deny defendant's motion to dismiss the indictment was not an abuse of discretion.
|
|||||
| McKinney v. State, Court of Appeals No. A-6969, No. 4160,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, December 8, 1999, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Evidence of defendant's prior driving while intoxicated (DWI) convictions were properly admitted at DWI trial, effect of inadmissible breath test evidence was properly minimized, and mistrial was not properly requested.
|
|||||
| Stream v. Municipality of Anchorage, Court of Appeals No. A-7169, No. 4156,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, December 8, 1999, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's conviction for DWI affirmed; evidence of DWI not suppressed because defendant failed to requested a phone call before submitting to a breath test.
|
|||||
| Alaska Nat'l Ins. Co. v. Jones, Supreme Court No. S-8519, No. 5215,
SUPREME COURT OF ALASKA, December 10, 1999, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Appellant insurance company had a colorable claim against appellee attorneys for reimbursement from proceeds generated in a third-party settlement under an equitable lien theory or the constructive trust doctrine.
|
|||||
| Lacher v. Lacher, Supreme Court No. S-8441, No. 5214,
SUPREME COURT OF ALASKA, December 10, 1999, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because an original divorce decree omitted several marital assets from the property division, it was not an abuse of discretion to grant a motion to set aside the divorce decree in order to allocate the omitted assets.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
