 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Berger v. Wien Air Alaska, Supreme Court No. S-8922, No. 5231,
SUPREME COURT OF ALASKA, January 21, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Medical expenses incurred by an employee, but paid for by a private insurer or other collateral sources, may offset the employer's credit under workers' compensation statute.
|
|||||
| Carlson v. Doyon Universal-Ogden Servs., Supreme Court No. S-8888, No. 5233,
SUPREME COURT OF ALASKA, January 21, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where employer proved, by preponderance of the evidence, that appellant was not permanently and totally disabled, decision of Alaska Workers' Compensation Board to deny benefits was affirmed.
|
|||||
| Moore v. Allstate Ins. Co., Supreme Court No. S-8574, No. 5232,
SUPREME COURT OF ALASKA, January 21, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Grant of summary judgment reversed; the federal government had not retained exclusive jurisdiction over fraud and misrepresentation claims against flood insurers.
|
|||||
| Balough v. Fairbanks N. Star Borough, Supreme Court No. S-8141, No. 5234,
SUPREME COURT OF ALASKA, January 28, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Appellant property owners were afforded opportunity to bring conforming use property into code in order to receive grandfather rights when the property's zoning was changed to render its use nonconforming.
|
|||||
| Bingaman v. Municipality of Anchorage, Court of Appeals No. A-6765, No. 4179,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, February 2, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because a state statute permitted a municipality to enact a forfeiture provision that was broader than state law, the municipal forfeiture provision was consistent with state legislation and did not frustrate state law.
|
|||||
| Cho v. State, Court of Appeals No. A-7023, No. 4182,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, February 2, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Fourth-degree assault convictions affirmed; lesser-included offense convictions did not have to mean jury believed self-defense theory, but possibly meant jury rejected that restaurant implements were dangerous instruments.
|
|||||
| Godsoe v. State, Court of Appeals No. A-7275, No. 4183,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, February 2, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The appeal was dismissed; appellant's sentence was less than the maximum sentence allowed under his plea agreement so the court lacked jurisdiction to consider the claim that the judge incorrectly applied a mitigating sentencing factor.
|
|||||
| MacDonald v. State, Court of Appeals No. A-7045, No. 4178,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, February 2, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Conviction for second-degree escape affirmed; it was not error to fail to instruct the jury on a lesser offense of fourth-degree escape.
|
|||||
| Madison v. Municipality of Anchorage, Court of Appeals No. A-7280, No. 4180,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, February 2, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Judgment was affirmed, because appellant's sentence on the false information charges was not excessive since appellant clearly qualified as a worst offender.
|
|||||
| Reinhold v. State, Court of Appeals No. A-7251, No. 4181,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, February 2, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A defendant's second degree murder sentence was not excessive where her conduct to her two-year-old foster child was long-term, cruel, and violent, and the trial court did not even impose the maximum sentence.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
