 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Moody v. Delta Western, Supreme Court No. S-9625, No. 5522,
SUPREME COURT OF ALASKA, January 11, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Firefighter's rule applied in Alaska and barred police chief's recovery for an injury incurred stopping a stolen truck. Summary judgment was proper.
|
|||||
| State v. Smith, Supreme Court No. S-9546, No. 5523,
SUPREME COURT OF ALASKA, January 11, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Interrogation was non-custodial where defendant initiated interview with police, questioning occurred in mid-afternoon, the interview lasted 30 minutes, defendant's friends were present, and officer told defendant he was free to leave.
|
|||||
| Stoneking v. State, Court of Appeals No. A-7822, No. 1783,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, January 11, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where sentence modification statute was expressly retroactive, trial court did not err in applying the amended version of statute to defendant's application to modify and dismissed the application as untimely under the amendment.
|
|||||
| Velasquez v. Velasquez, Supreme Court No. S-10118, No. 5525,
SUPREME COURT OF ALASKA, January 11, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In determining custody, trial court did not commit error in considering manner and circumstances in which mother left marital home, her lack of contact with children after she left, and effect of her conduct on children.
|
|||||
| Wasserman v. Bartholomew, Supreme Court No. S-9604, No. 5524,
SUPREME COURT OF ALASKA, January 11, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Court did not err in finding that officers asked arrestee for identification before grabbing him where several officers testified that they heard the arresting officer make the request for identification.
|
|||||
| Daniels v. State, Court of Appeals No. A-7832, No. 4520,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, January 16, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Sentence was not excessive, where trial court considered defendant's felony adjudications, his repeated probation and parole violations, and history of substance abuse without positive treatment results.
|
|||||
| French v. State, Court of Appeals No. A-7861, No. 4521,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, January 16, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's convictions were upheld because the admission of evidence was proper, he was not deprived of due process, and the denial of a motion for new trial based on newly discovered evidence was not an abuse of discretion.
|
|||||
| Titus v. State, Court of Appeals No. A-7683, No. 4519,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, January 16, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where prosecutor's comments asking jurors to put themselves in the place of the victim was addressing the question of witness credibility, and defense attorney did not object, prosecutor's comments did not constitute plain error.
|
|||||
| Kaiser v. Sakata, Supreme Court No. S-9618, No. 5526,
SUPREME COURT OF ALASKA, January 18, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court did not err in dismissing malpractice claims, as superior court made adequate allowances for appellant's pro se status and did not err in the rulings challenged on appeal.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
