 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Gallagher v. State, Court of Appeals No. A-9979, No. 5437,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, February 4, 2009, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Police did not violate defendant's rights under Alaska Stat. ¿ 12.25.150(b) because defendant's statement that he would need to speak with an attorney to understand why his current DUI charge was a felony while prior DUI charges had been misdemeanors did not constitute a request for counsel prior to deciding whether to submit to a breath test.
|
|||||
| Greenwood v. State, Court of Appeals No. A-9930, No. 5438,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, February 4, 2009, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court did not abuse its discretion by refusing to instruct jury on defense of necessity because when defendant testified that she drove past boyfriend's parents' house without stopping because she did not want to encounter him, who had left her house before she did, she all be eliminated her claimed justification for driving under influence.
|
|||||
| Skan v. Dep't of Revenue, Child Support Servs. Div., Supreme Court No. S-12505, No. 1329,
SUPREME COURT OF ALASKA, February 4, 2009, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Frank v. State, Court of Appeals No. A-9933, No. 5440,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, February 11, 2009, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Hernandez v. State, Court of Appeals No. A-9714, No. 5439,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, February 11, 2009, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Swetzof v. Philemonoff, Supreme Court No. S-13165, No. 6336,
SUPREME COURT OF ALASKA, February 13, 2009, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Jeremy S. v. State, Supreme Court No. S-13066, No. 1330,
SUPREME COURT OF ALASKA, February 18, 2009, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Turner v. Turner, Supreme Court No. S-12405, No. 1331,
SUPREME COURT OF ALASKA, February 18, 2009, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The classification of a wife's inheritance as marital was proper because the inheritance was transmuted into marital property. The wife deposited her inheritance into a joint savings account from which she and the husband withdrew funds to pay mortgages and to purchase a plane, a boat, and other vehicles, all of which were jointly held and titled.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
