LexisNexis
  
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!

Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!

While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.


   State Courts - Alaska - January 12 - January 17, 2001

  
Bradley v. State, Court of Appeals No. A-7501, No. 1712, COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, January 12, 2001, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: A former law clerk can appear as an attorney in a case that was pending in the appellate court during his employment if either (1) he did not participate personally and substantially in the case, or (2) all parties to the proceeding consent.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Rollins v. Ulmer, Supreme Court No. S-09197, No. 5356, SUPREME COURT OF ALASKA, January 12, 2001, Order Decided
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Rollins v. Ulmer, Supreme Court No. S-9197, No. 5356, SUPREME COURT OF ALASKA, January 12, 2001, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: Medical marijuana law, requiring registration of authorized users, did not violate privacy rights where the registry was kept confidential and only authorized public officials could use it for narrowly specified purposes.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Strane v. State, Court of Appeals No. A-7014, No. 1711, COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, January 12, 2001, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: In order to prove defendant guilty of violating a domestic violence protective order, the State had to prove defendant knew his conduct violated order or he was aware of a substantial probability his conduct violated order.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Tlingit-Haida Reg'l Elec. Auth. v. State, Supreme Court No. S-8833, S-8834 and S-8843, No. 5357, SUPREME COURT OF ALASKA, January 12, 2001, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: Utility company had no compensable property interest in its certificate allowing it to operate in a certain territory, as the public utility commission, as a condition of issuing the certificate, reserved the right to revoke it for good cause.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Bright v. State, Court of Appeals No. A-7305, No. 4341, COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, January 17, 2001, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: Court need not have accepted allegations of appellant's post-conviction relief petition as true, and properly denied appellant's claim of ineffective assistance of counsel without a hearing, as the State was entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Negron v. State, Court of Appeals No. A-7489, No. 4342, COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, January 17, 2001, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: State acted consistent with double jeopardy by first bringing traffic charges against defendant and then subsequently charging him with cocaine possession, despite fact that offenses all arose out of same criminal episode.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Back to Top
  

 www.lexisnexis.com  |  About LexisNexis  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Customer Support  |  Contact Us
  Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.