LexisNexis
  
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!

Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!

While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.


   State Courts - Alaska - January 23 - January 30, 2002

  
Blankenship v. State, Court of Appeals No. A-7953, No. 4526, COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, January 23, 2002, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: Defendant's history of assaults and illegal contacts with his wife was an adequate basis for ordering defendant to have a mental health evaluation and outweighed defendant's normal right not to be evaluated without his consent.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Donovan v. Municipality of Anchorage, Court of Appeals No. A-7922, No. 4523, COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, January 23, 2002, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: Where defendant did not ask arresting officer, or otherwise indicate that she wanted to talk to her sister or anyone else before administration of the breath test, defendant did not invoke statutory right of contact prior to testing.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Glenn v. State, Court of Appeals No. A-7979, No. 4524, COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, January 23, 2002, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: The clearly erroneous standard of review was the required standard for reviewing trial court's denial of defendant's motion to suppress, even though the motion was decided solely on the basis of a tape recording and not on live testimony.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Soto v. State, Court of Appeals No. A-7993, No. 4525, COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, January 23, 2002, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: Sentence imposed on defendant, who was convicted of, among other things, second degree murder, was affirmed, where the record supported the conclusion defendant and an accomplice engaged in intimidating behavior to obtain drugs in the past.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
M.J.S. v. State, Supreme Court No. S-10212, No. 5527, SUPREME COURT OF ALASKA, January 25, 2002, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: Trial court properly terminated mother's parental rights to her daughter because of mother's chronic substance abuse problem; despite friend's competent caregiving, mother's conduct continued to expose daughter to a substantial risk of harm.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
State v. Hawkins, Court of Appeals No. A-7615, Court of Appeals No. A-7616, No. 1784, COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, January 25, 2002, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: Where legislative intent to sex offender registration statute was to impose continuing registration requirement upon sex offenders, interpretation that charging an offender after an enactment date was ex post facto violation was reversed.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Kotongan v. State, Court of Appeals No. A-7504, Court of Appeals No. A-7506, Court of Appeals No. A-7508, Court of Appeals No. A-7509, Court of Appeals No. A-7510, Court of Appeals No. A-7582, No. 4527, COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, January 30, 2002, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: Defendants were subject to criminal penalties for failing to comply with the general duty to register as sex offenders; defendants were also required to file annual or quarterly statements, and were subject to prosecution for failing to do so.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Back to Top
  

 www.lexisnexis.com  |  About LexisNexis  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Customer Support  |  Contact Us
  Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.