 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Anderson v. State, Court of Appeals No. A-8064, No. 4823,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, January 28, 2004, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A trial court did not abuse its discretion in admitting, as an excited utterance, a victim's statement that defendant had hit him with a pipe. The assault occurred recently, and the victim was still in pain and under the excitement of the assault.
|
|||||
| Charles v. State, Court of Appeals No. A-8494, No. 4828,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, January 28, 2004, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Although the State should have filed an affidavit when it sought to forfeit a performance bond, the error was harmless, because the trial court did not forfeit the bonds until it held a hearing and the surety had an opportunity to be heard.
|
|||||
| Christiansen v. State, Court of Appeals No. A-8085, No. 4824,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, January 28, 2004, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A superior court did not abuse its discretion in denying defendant's motions for additional continuances, as it had already granted three continuances and defendant and his attorneys had ample time to investigate the case, which was not complex.
|
|||||
| Frese v. State, Court of Appeals No. A-8537, No. 4829,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, January 28, 2004, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Inmate's petition for post-conviction relief alleging ineffective assistance of trial counsel was properly denied. The inmate failed to demonstrate his trial counsel's performance was deficient or caused him any prejudice.
|
|||||
| Grandberry-Williams v. State, Court of Appeals No. A-8384, No. 4827,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, January 28, 2004, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Evidence that defendant repeatedly punched a stranger who approached him in a parking lot and that the stranger suffered chipped teeth and had difficulty breathing afterwards was sufficient to sustain defendant's conviction for first-degree assault.
|
|||||
| Hykes v. State, Court of Appeals No. A-8158, No. 4825,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, January 28, 2004, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The court properly revoked defendant's conviction upon his failure to complete sex offender treatment. He was not entitled to have his underlying conviction for sexual abuse of a minor set aside for his lack of acting with sexual intent.
|
|||||
| Lee v. Municipality of Anchorage, Court of Appeals No. A-8205, No. 4821,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, January 28, 2004, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: On remand, the trial court properly considered the two mental states for the municipal offense of maintaining a place of prostitution and properly found that defendant had also violated her release conditions.
|
|||||
| Pariseau v. State, Court of Appeals No. A-8616, No. 4826,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, January 28, 2004, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The district court was not required to dismiss an indictment charging defendant with driving while intoxicated, because the State misidentified the vehicle defendant was driving at the time of his arrest.
|
|||||
| Taylor v. State, Court of Appeals No. A-8506, No. 4822,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, January 28, 2004, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Although statute stated that prisoner who had served his sentence less good time shall be released on mandatory parole, it did not prevent delivering prisoner who was released on mandatory parole to another jurisdiction entitled to custody.
|
|||||
| Tyler v. State, Court of Appeals No. A-8610, No. 4820,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, January 28, 2004, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's maximum sentence for felony DWI was remanded to determine whether imposing a composite sentence over the five-year maximum term was required in order to protect the public.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
