 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Alexander v. State, Court of Appeals No. A-7495, No. 4346,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, January 31, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: One year statute of limitation on applications for postconviction relied did not violate constitutional habeas corpus protections, so appellant's application filed 10 years after his conviction was properly time-barred.
|
|||||
| Deveraux v. State, Court of Appeals No. A-7515, No. 4345,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, January 31, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Upon revocation of his parole due to a new criminal conviction, appellant was sentenced to serve the remainder of his sentence, plus a new sentence, consecutively.
|
|||||
| Mikell v. State, Court of Appeals No. A-7483, No. 4347,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, January 31, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The evidence at sentencing supported the judge's conclusion that appellant intentionally took the victim's life.
|
|||||
| Taplet v. State, Court of Appeals No. A-7484, No. 4344,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, January 31, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Appellant's motion for postconviction relief for ineffective assistance of counsel was denied because the appellant failed to show counsel's failure to seek a jury instruction was incompetent and prejudiced the appellant.
|
|||||
| Harmon v. State, Court of Appeals No. A-7200, No. 4349,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, February 7, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Court affirmed convictions of murder and sexual assault where, in part, appellant could not prove ineffective assistance of counsel because he did not establish that counsel's failure to object was below standard of reasonably competent attorney.
|
|||||
| Loe v. State, Court of Appeals No. A-7380, No. 4351,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, February 7, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court did not violate assault defendant's due process rights when it refused to order the transport of several inmates from a correctional facility to testify in person at defendant's trial.
|
|||||
| Owens v. State, Court of Appeals No. A-7704, No. 4352,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, February 7, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Sentence imposed on revocation of defendant's probation was affirmed, since record supported the finding that he had not made an effort to comply with a treatment program, and that, as an untreated sex offender, he was a danger to the public.
|
|||||
| Punguk v. State, Court of Appeals No. A-7332, No. 4348,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, February 7, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Appellant, denied opportunity to conduct recross examination, failed to show prejudice. Findings he did not establish mitigating factors were not clearly erroneous, as was finding presumptive term was not manifestly unjust.
|
|||||
| Williams v. Crawford, Supreme Court No. S-9791, No. 5532,
SUPREME COURT OF ALASKA, February 8, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The superior court erred on remand when it failed to follow instructions from the Alaska Supreme Court awarding the ex-wife one-half of the marital share of the ex-husband's pension valued as of August 12, 1992.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
