 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Avery v. State, Court of Appeals No. A-7840, No. 4529,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, February 13, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant was properly convicted for individual counts of assault for recklessly placing certain individuals in danger of physical injury and also properly convicted of reckless endangerment for creating substantial risk to other unnamed persons.
|
|||||
| Johnson v. State, Court of Appeals No. A-7651, No. 4531,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, February 13, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where defendant allowed police to enter his apartment and consented to their request for a "quick look around," but then lifted a cloth covering a coffee table and observed drug paraphernalia, the search exceeded the scope of defendant's consent.
|
|||||
| Kochendorfer v. State, Court of Appeals No. A-7591, No. 4528,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, February 13, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In embezzlement case, given the number of transactions with a discrepancy, the jury properly could have inferred that inmate account system was short because of theft rather than because of the other explanations offered by defendant at trial.
|
|||||
| Williams v. State, Court of Appeals No. A-7688, No. 4530,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, February 13, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Prosecutor's reference to tape-recorded statement of witness that was not introduced at trial accurately reflected the evidence the jury heard, therefore it was not an improper argument to point out that tape recording had not been introduced.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
