 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| C.P. ex rel. M.L. v. Allstate Ins. Co., Supreme Court No. S-8606, No. 5245,
SUPREME COURT OF ALASKA, March 3, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: On certification, the court decided that an insurance claims adjuster owed a duty of care to the insured independent of any contractual obligation and in the absence of a policy exclusion, the insurance policy covered a negligence claim.
|
|||||
| MacDonald v. State, Court of Appeals No. A-7231, No. 1665,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, March 3, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A defendant was convicted of violating an ex parte protective order when he had actual knowledge of the order, the order did not violate his due process rights, and the service of process statute was not unconstitutionally vague.
|
|||||
| Simon v. State, Supreme Court No. S-8801, No. 5244,
SUPREME COURT OF ALASKA, March 3, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court's finding of reasonable necessity regarding defendant state's expansion or alteration of highway's course and its use of any subsurface materials in the building process was not clearly erroneous.
|
|||||
| Skvorc v. State, Supreme Court No. S-8398, No. 5246,
SUPREME COURT OF ALASKA, March 3, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Appellant who used state job to further private business committed multiple ethics violations, so personnel board decision was affirmed except for one count remanded to determine if insufficient notice had been prejudicial.
|
|||||
| State v. Hodari, Supreme Court No. S-8569, No. 5243,
SUPREME COURT OF ALASKA, March 3, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In sentencing defendant to composite sentence of 55 years, trial judge appropriately considered prior cases involving similar offenders and offenses, and, using benchmark as starting point, appropriately fashioned sentence.
|
|||||
| Chukanak v. State, Court of Appeals No. A-7425, No. 4192,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, March 8, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial judge did not fail to adequately explain his sentencing decision in terms of the Chaney sentencing goals, and trial judge was not clearly mistaken when he imposed the remaining 45 months of appellant's sentence.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
