 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Palmer v. Municipality of Anchorage, Police & Fire Ret. Bd., Supreme Court No. S-10062, No. 5670,
SUPREME COURT OF ALASKA, March 7, 2003, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The employee was properly denied occupational disability benefits for heart disease because there was testimony from the doctors that his disease was not related to his employment and that job-stress did not contribute to his disability.
|
|||||
| Wyatt v. Estate of Wyatt, Supreme Court No. S-9087, No. 5671,
SUPREME COURT OF ALASKA, March 7, 2003, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court properly upheld an agreement to transfer contested assets in a wrongful death lawsuit pending the outcome of the criminal's murder conviction appeal, and after the appeal failed the estate was entitled to retain the assets transferred.
|
|||||
| Aiken v. State, Court of Appeals No. A-7974, No. 4673,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, March 12, 2003, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant could not assert attorney-client privilege, because he sought lawyer to commit a crime or fraud, therefore, defendant was not harmed in any way by the interjection of the attorney-client privilege issue into his trial.
|
|||||
| Burks v. State, Court of Appeals No. A-8220, No. 4674,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, March 12, 2003, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Any potential prejudice from attorney's relationship with eyewitness was eliminated by the State's decision not to call the witness; therefore, defendant's attorney did not have a conflict of interest and provided effective representation.
|
|||||
| Johnson v. State, Court of Appeals No. A-7867, No. 4676,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, March 12, 2003, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where witness's testimony tended to show defendant perpetrated past sexual abuse and where witness's testimony was very similar to victim's, it was not an abuse of discretion to permit witness to testify to defendant's prior act of sexual abuse.
|
|||||
| Katchatag v. State, Court of Appeals No. A-8366, No. 4675,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, March 12, 2003, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where defendant had an extensive criminal history, assaulted victim while she was unconscious, and was unable to control his alcohol abuse and his behavior when he was drinking, trial court did not err in finding defendant was a worst offender.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
