 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Arnett v. State, Court of Appeals No. A-7318, No. 4223,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, May 31, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Dismissal of appellant's second petition for post-conviction relief was affirmed, as appellant was statutorily barred from pursuing a second petition for post-conviction relief.
|
|||||
| Dennis v. State, Court of Appeals No. A-6989, No. 4222,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, May 31, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant was not denied a fair trial because he was not allowed to introduce evidence of assault victim's criminal past, as evidence of victim's criminal past was not crucial to establishing bias of prosecution witness.
|
|||||
| Hanson v. State, Court of Appeals No. A-7262, No. 4221,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, May 31, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial judge did not err in finding that defendant did not establish fair and just reason to withdraw his no contest plea, where defendant had merely changed his mind about whether to enter a plea.
|
|||||
| Pentland v. State, Court of Appeals No. A-7268, No. 4224,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, May 31, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's conviction on three counts of indecent exposure was affirmed, where evidence was sufficient to support jury's determination that he knowingly exposed his genitals in the presence of three girls.
|
|||||
| Bowers v. State, Supreme Court No. S-8825, No. 5280,
SUPREME COURT OF ALASKA, June 2, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where the state, to prove its case of assault with a firearm, relied on defendant's use of a revolver but not his use of a rifle, it was error to give the jury a supplemental instruction which included assault with the rifle.
|
|||||
| Flanigan v. State, Court of Appeals No. A-7116, No. 1677,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, June 2, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The petition for post-conviction relief did not include a claim within the scope of the common law writ of habeas corpus, therefore dismissal of the petition did not violate the constitutional prohibition on suspending the writ.
|
|||||
| Flanigan v. State, Court of Appeals No. A-07116,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, June 2, 2000, Date of Order
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In order to excuse the failure to meet statutory filing deadline for post-conviction relief, defendant must prove that agents of the State "physically prevented" him from filing a timely petition.
|
|||||
| Northern State Envtl. Ctr. v. Department of Natural Resources, Supreme Court No. S-9367, No. 5279,
SUPREME COURT OF ALASKA, June 2, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Agency decision to issue right-of-way permit to electrical company for transmission line construction without a best interest finding was reversed and remanded. Permit was a disposal of land and was not functionally revocable.
|
|||||
| Wardlow v. State, Court of Appeals No. A-6988, No. 1676,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, June 2, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Court held that defendant's attorney waived defendant's right to assert that he was denied a speedy trial pursuant to statutory provision when she consented to trial date known to fall beyond statutorily established deadline.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
