 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Berge v. State, Court of Appeals No. A-8683, No. 4972,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, March 16, 2005, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The inmate's petition for post-conviction relief based on ineffective assistance of counsel was properly denied because, inter alia, he knowingly waived his right to counsel and consented to be interviewed after receiving proper Miranda warning, which was fatal to his claim that the police interview violated his Sixth Amendment right to counsel.
|
|||||
| Matthew B. v. State, Supreme Court No. S-11522, No. 1207,
SUPREME COURT OF ALASKA, March 16, 2005, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where a father had murdered his children's mother, court did not err in terminating his parental rights pursuant to Alaska Stat. ¿ 47.10.080(o) finding children could not get over murder if he remained in their life, they had had opportunity to bond with maternal aunt and uncle who wished to adopt them and with whom they had been living since 2002.
|
|||||
| Wedman v. Wedman, Supreme Court No. S-11276,
SUPREME COURT OF ALASKA, March 16, 2005, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Grunert v. State, Supreme Court No. S-10841, No. 5880,
SUPREME COURT OF ALASKA, March 17, 2005, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Alaska Admin. Code tit. 5, ¿ 15.359 (2002), which created a cooperative fishery in the Chignik area and allocated a quota of salmon to that fishery, was inconsistent with the Alaska Limited Entry Act purpose and policy and was invalid; the regulation employed means outside the authorized powers of the Alaska Board of Fisheries.
|
|||||
| Berg v. Popham, Supreme Court No. S-10815, No. 5879,
SUPREME COURT OF ALASKA, March 18, 2005, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Alaska Stat. ¿ 46.03.822, in contrast to 42 U.S.C.S. ¿ 9607(a)(3) of CERCLA, did not require that the dry cleaning equipment manufacturer and installer own, possess, have authority to control or a duty to dispose of the hazardous substance that was released from the owners' dry cleaning premises, before they could be subject to arranger liability.
|
|||||
| David v. State, Court of Appeals No. A-8548, No. 4973,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, March 23, 2005, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In defendant's trial for sexual assault and assault, late disclosure of evidence log did not prejudice defense because, pursuant to Alaska R. Crim. P. 16, disclosure was not automatic. In addition, defendant's 30-year sentence pursuant to Alaska Stat. ¿ 12.55.125 was not unreasonable because of aggravating factors and defendant's criminal history.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
