Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free! Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free! While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
	State Courts - Alaska - April 8 - April 13, 2005
	Clement v. Fulton, Supreme Court No. S-11077, No. 5883, SUPREME COURT OF ALASKA, April 8, 2005, Decided View this case - free   Overview: In a case involving allocation of wrongful death proceeds, a court did not err by finding that the decedent's life expectancy might have exceeded one year if she had been correctly diagnosed with leukemia because the court could have permissibly read a reference to long-term survival to imply that proper care made long-term survival a possibility. Search Cases for Free | Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers | Case Summary Email Service - 50% off
	Brewer v. State, Court of Appeals No. A-8794, No. 4980, COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, April 13, 2005, Decided View this case - free   Overview: There was sufficient evidence that the commonly used form of marijuana defendant possessed was four ounces or more because defendant was allowed to argue that the marijuana buds were the only "commonly used form" found on the plants. Search Cases for Free | Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers | Case Summary Email Service - 50% off
	Zwingelberg v. State, Court of Appeals No. A-8762, No. 4979, COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, April 13, 2005, Decided View this case - free   Overview: Trial court did not err in denying defendant's suppression motion because police had probable cause to arrest him for DWI at the time they went to his home, thus they were entitled to wait for him on the porch and wife's consent for police to enter the home was voluntary where her communications with the officers did not reflect duress or coercion. Search Cases for Free | Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers | Case Summary Email Service - 50% off
	Back to Top
	www.lexisnexis.com  |  About LexisNexis  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Customer Support  |  Contact Us   Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.