 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Gibson v. State, Court of Appeals No. A-9720, No. 2212,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, April 10, 2009, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In a case in which defendant was convicted of drug offenses, police unlawfully entered defendant's trailer following his arrest. Although the State argued that police were authorized to enter the trailer under the emergency aid exception to the warrant requirement, police had no reason to believe that there was anyone else in the trailer.
|
|||||
| Reust v. Alaska Petroleum Contrs., Inc., Supreme Court No. S-12863, No. 6359,
SUPREME COURT OF ALASKA, April 10, 2009, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Shea v. Dep't of Admin, Div. of Ret. and Ben., Supreme Court No. S-12869, No. 6358,
SUPREME COURT OF ALASKA, April 10, 2009, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Alexie v. State, Court of Appeals No. A-9941, No. 5471,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, April 15, 2009, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where two public defender agency attorneys represented appellant on sexual assault and sexual abuse charges, one of the attorneys also represented the victim. The superior court erred by dismissing appellant's application filed for post-conviction relief in which he raised the attorneys' conflicts of interest under Alaska R. Prof. Conduct 1.7.
|
|||||
| Gonzalez v. Alejandro Reina Bernal, Supreme Court No. S-12784, No. 1338,
SUPREME COURT OF ALASKA, April 15, 2009, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Leichty v. State, Court of Appeals No. A-9963, No. 5469,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, April 15, 2009, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Smith v. State, Court of Appeals No. A-9596, No. 5468,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, April 15, 2009, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant convicted of felony murder under Alaska Stat. ¿ 11.41.110(a)(3) was not entitled to a jury instruction on the lesser included offense of manslaughter because the jury convicted defendant of the felony of robbery. It would have been irrational for the jury to have acquitted defendant of felony murder under these circumstances.
|
|||||
| Van Doren v. State, Court of Appeals No. A-9613, No. 5470,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, April 15, 2009, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant was not entitled to have the breath test refusal charge under Alaska Stat. ¿ 28.35.032(p) dismissed based on the trooper's misinforming him about the penalty he faced if he refused because record supported the judge's finding that defendant's decision to refuse was not based on the inaccurate warning.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
