 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Alliniece v. State, Court of Appeals No. A-7213, No. 4206,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, April 19, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's conviction for tampering with physical evidence was reversed, because he had not attempted to hide the drugs, but merely tried to rid himself of contraband by dropping them onto the street behind a parked car.
|
|||||
| Dayton v. State, Court of Appeals No. A-7067, No. 4204,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, April 19, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Convictions reversed; there was no reason, and police did not have probable cause, to believe that contraband would be found in appellant's box; the seizure of the box could not be justified as a search incident to arrest.
|
|||||
| Jackson v. State, Court of Appeals No. A-7141, No. 4207,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, April 19, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial judge's restitution order was struck, as trial judge had no authority to order defendant to pay restitution after defendant's sentence was originally imposed.
|
|||||
| Turney v. State, Court of Appeals No. A-7112, No. 4205,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, April 19, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Jury tampering statute was neither vague nor overbroad, and did not involve protected speech. Appellant could not have reasonably believed he had permission to contact jurors to discuss jury nullification.
|
|||||
| Alaska Gen. Alarm v. Grinnell, Supreme Court No. S-8318, No. 5263,
SUPREME COURT OF ALASKA, April 21, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Statute of limitations for plaintiff's underlying tort action against defendant did not apply to defendant's claims against third-party defendant for equitable apportionment.
|
|||||
| Deyonge v. Nana/Marriott & Alaska Nat'l Ins. Co., Supreme Court No. S-9060, No. 5265,
SUPREME COURT OF ALASKA, April 21, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In workers' compensation case, when employee claimed her work for employer worsened illness, court rejected distinction between aggravation of symptoms and aggravation of underlying impairment. Denial of benefits reversed.
|
|||||
| M.C. v. Northern Ins. Co., Supreme Court No. S-8558, No. 5264,
SUPREME COURT OF ALASKA, April 21, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Insurer, who provided newspaper's general liability insurance, was not liable for newspaper manager's criminal sexual act against newspaper delivery girl where policy specifically excluded injurious acts against co-employees.
|
|||||
| Harper v. State, Court of Appeals No. A-7209, No. 4208,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, April 26, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: An over-size beer bottle constituted a dangerous instrument because defendant's use of the same was capable of causing death or serious physical injury; a dangerous instrument's use was an element of third degree assault. Conviction affirmed.
|
|||||
| Steffey v. Municipality of Anchorage, Supreme Court No. S-8929, No. 5266,
SUPREME COURT OF ALASKA, April 28, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Denial of employee's workers' compensation claim was affirmed since employer presented substantial evidence that work was not substantial factor in aggravating employee's disability based on testimony of two doctors.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
