 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Randall v. State, Court of Appeals No. A-8021, No. 1795,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, March 22, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Aggravating factors increasing defendant's assault sentence above presumptive term and conviction for factually separate theft provided good cause for sentencing court to exceed the presumptive term for defendant's assault conviction.
|
|||||
| Freeman v. State, No. A-7658, No. 4550,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, March 27, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where evidence against defendant in murder case was strong and it was extremely unlikely that evidence he fired a gun at a stereo a few months earlier had any appreciable effect on the jury's verdict, its admission was harmless error.
|
|||||
| Pence v. State, No. A-7949 No. 4549,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, March 27, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: State trooper's comment at DWI trial about defendant's post-arrest exercise of his right to remain silent was improper; however, trial judge immediately recognized that, sua sponte intervened, and gave jury appropriate curative instruction.
|
|||||
| Hubbard v. Hubbard, Supreme Court No. S-9562, No. 5554,
SUPREME COURT OF ALASKA, March 29, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Step-father was equitably estopped from disestablishing paternity of stepson because of financial harm step-son would suffer; step-father participated in decision, with mother, to terminate child support proceedings against biological father.
|
|||||
| Miller v. State, Court of Appeals No. A-7804, No. 1796,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, March 29, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant failed to prove that his conduct fell among least serious encompassed by definition of attempted second-degree sexual abuse, where his conduct was in no sense mitigated by fact that he may have also committed separate crime.
|
|||||
| State v. Zeciri, No. A-7712,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, March 29, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Court erred by granting defendant's postconviction relief motion where court failed to make specific findings regarding the ineffectiveness of defendant's counsel.
|
|||||
| Frankson v. State, No. A-6802 , No. 4553,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, April 3, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where defendant committed an intentional predatory assault with a deadly weapon that resulted in the brutal death of victim, and defendant had a history of recent violence, 60-year net sentence was not clearly mistaken.
|
|||||
| Moehlin v. State, Court of Appeals No. A-8003, No. 4551,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, April 3, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's decision to struggle with trooper, rather than allow trooper to control his hands, led not only to trooper's use of pepper spray, but to intervention of bystanders, creating hazard that supported disorderly conduct conviction.
|
|||||
| Williams v. State, No. A-7732, No. 4552,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, April 3, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where defendant placed his character in issue in issue at trial and failed to object to cross-examination of his character witness during trial, defendant failed to show how failure to limit cross-examination was prejudicial to defendant.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
