 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Conner v. Conner, Supreme Court No. S-102730,
SUPREME COURT OF ALASKA, April 18, 2003, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The trial court erred by imputing the husband's disability payments from his retirement income when dividing the parties' marital property, in calculating the maturity date of his retirement benefits, and by awarding rehabilitative alimony.
|
|||||
| Coughlin v. Gov't Emples. Ins. Co. Geico, Supreme Court No. S-10072, No. 5681,
SUPREME COURT OF ALASKA, April 18, 2003, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where insured settled with driver's insurer for $ 40,000 in cash and assumed responsibility for a $ 10,000 medical lien, the insured settled for the policy limits of $ 50,000, and therefore was entitled to pursue UIM coverage from her insured.
|
|||||
| Myers v. Alaska Hous. Fin. Corp., Supreme Court No. S-9941, No. 5682,
SUPREME COURT OF ALASKA, April 18, 2003, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Selling right to receive future revenue from tobacco lawsuit settlement was constitutional where appropriation power included selling state assets; settlement was not traditional source of revenue; legislature had responsibility to manage risk.
|
|||||
| Nelson v. State, Court of Appeals No. A-8113,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, April 18, 2003, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: There was no indication that jurors who were sworn to try defendant's case were anything but fair, impartial, open-minded jurors; therefore, trial court did not abuse its discretion when it denied defendant's request to discharge the entire panel.
|
|||||
| Ayagarak v. State, Court of Appeals No. A-8066, No. 4695,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, April 23, 2003, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where defendant claimed self-defense in using force against his wife, evidence of prior assaults against the wife were relevant to rebut defendant's claim of self-defense and to show the nature of the spouses' relationship.
|
|||||
| Christian v. State, Court of Appeals No. A-7985, No. 4692,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, April 23, 2003, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In a prosecution of defendant for second degree sexual abuse of a minor, the trial court did not err in preventing defendant from offering evidence about an incident involving the victim's father; this incident was not relevant to the defense.
|
|||||
| Deveraux v. State, Court of Appeals No. A-8135, No. 4694,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, April 23, 2003, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The trial court did not err in dismissing defendant's successive application for postconviction relief because the application did not state a prima facie case of ineffective assistance of counsel.
|
|||||
| Raphael v. State, Court of Appeals No. A-8025, No. 4693,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, April 23, 2003, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The evidence was supported by substantial evidence that defendant committed first-degree assault and reckless endangerment on the date alleged in the indictment, despite one child witness's inability to exactly remember the date of the offense.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
