 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Debbie G. v. Dep't of Health & Social Servs., Supreme Court No. S-11778, Supreme Court No. S-11782, No. 6000,
SUPREME COURT OF ALASKA, April 7, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Order terminating parents' rights was upheld where parents, who had history of substance abuse, mental problems, and criminal activity, had not remedied conditions in home that threatened child's safety, as required by Alaska Stat. § 47.10.088(a)(1)(B). Parents had no affirmative right under Alaska Stat. § 25.23.040 to decide who would adopt child.
|
|||||
| Myers v. Municipality of Anchorage, Court of Appeals No. A-8739, No. 2041,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, April 7, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Anchorage, Alaska, Mun. Code 08.35.010(A) and (B) were unconstitutional due to vagueness and because due process could have been violated due to the fact that a person could have been convicted of a crime without any proof that they acted with a culpable mental state.
|
|||||
| Parrish v. State, Court of Appeals No. A-9292, No. 2040,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, April 7, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant was sentenced for two felonies: breath test refusal and driving under the influence. Appellate court rejected argument that trial court erred because defendant appealed only one of two felonies and he failed to provide adequate record to review if trial court erred by refusing proposed mitigating factors under Alaska Stat. § 12.55.155.
|
|||||
| Auer v. State, Court of Appeals No. A-9442, No. 5068,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, April 12, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Following conviction for first-degree sexual abuse of a minor, superior court could have improperly sentenced defendant because superior court failed to consider proposed mitigating factor under Alaska Stat. § 12.55.155(d)(9); this factor could be based on circumstances beyond the specific conduct underlying the offense.
|
|||||
| Fortson v. Fortson, Supreme Court No. S-11332/S11341,
SUPREME COURT OF ALASKA, April 12, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Leavitt v. State, Court of Appeals No. A-8572, No. 5067,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, April 12, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In trial for third-degree assault and fourth-degree weapons misconduct, jury's acquittal on original offenses and conviction on lesser assault offense under Alaska Stat. § 11.41.230(a)(3) were not inconsistent verdicts because it was obvious jury had reasonable doubt as to whether defendant was armed during confrontation with officers.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
