 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Corbin v. Corbin, Supreme Court No. S-10281,
SUPREME COURT OF ALASKA, May 2, 2003, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where trial court set father's child support based on a 50/50 shared custody formula, even though one child was residing with a third-party, trial court erred when it calculated child support as if the one child was in a shared custody status.
|
|||||
| Jack C. v. State, Supreme Court No. S-10690,
SUPREME COURT OF ALASKA, May 2, 2003, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where father sexually abused both children and he failed to complete individualized treatment programs for sexual abuse, substance abuse, and anger management within a reasonable time, father's parental rights were properly terminated.
|
|||||
| Morton v. State, Court of Appeals No. A-8210,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, May 2, 2003, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because defendant possessed an ordinary screwdriver and an ordinary rubber mallet that had not been altered in any manner, and both items were not designed to commit a burglary, defendant did not commit the offense of possessing burglary tools.
|
|||||
| Parrott v. Municipality of Anchorage, Court of Appeals No. A-7829,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, May 2, 2003, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant solicited prostitution when he invited an undercover police officer into his truck for the purpose of oral sex. He waived his entrapment defense by failing to raise it pretrial.
|
|||||
| Porterfield v. State, Court of Appeals No. A-7899,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, May 2, 2003, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In defendant's murder-arson trial, hearsay statements of his wife and a third party implicating both defendant and his wife in the crimes were admissible as statements against interest.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
