 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Campbell v. State, Court of Appeals No. A-9539, No. 5210,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, April 25, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where defendant was coherent, able to follow directions, and asked several questions after being arrested for driving under the influence, she knowingly and intelligently waived the right to an independent test under Alaska Stat. § 28.35.033(e). Also, an officer did not interfere with the right by playing a song or commenting about defendant lying.
|
|||||
| Carr v. State, Court of Appeals No. A-8876, No. 5209,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, April 25, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In a case involving child sexual abuse and child pornography, a motion to sever was properly denied because there was a nexus between the two sets of charges, and defendant was not unduly prejudiced by the joinder, pursuant to Alaska R. Crim. P. 8 and Alaska R. Crim. P. 14.
|
|||||
| Carvalho v. State, Court of Appeals No. A-9722, No. 5208,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, April 25, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant sought a reduction of sentence; however, defendant's conduct in a first degree robbery was not the least serious. Also defendant did not have right to appeal on ground of sentence excessiveness, pursuant to Alaska Stat. § 12.55.120(a); Alaska R. App. P. 215(a)(1), because defendant agreed to the sentence.
|
|||||
| Kirchner v. State, Court of Appeals No. A-9545, No. 5211,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, April 25, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant was sentenced to a presumptive sentence for robbery and assault, pursuant to a plea agreement. Although sentencing was not submitted to a jury, a jury was not required because sentencing court found aggravating factors, pursuant to Alaska Stat. § 12.55.155, that were supported by the record.
|
|||||
| Kracker v. Copeland, Supreme Court No. S-12130, No. 1275,
SUPREME COURT OF ALASKA, April 25, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In a divorce case, a superior court's decision regarding the classification of a debt as a marital liability was upheld where both parties agreed with such during the trial; it was not error to refuse to let a former husband argue otherwise after the evidence was closed.
|
|||||
| Martin v. Coastal Villages Region Fund, Supreme Court No. S-11999, No. 6120,
SUPREME COURT OF ALASKA, April 27, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In suit to recover money deposited with a trial court, commercial fishers, who had contracted with a fisher from Juneau, should not have been barred because the Juneau fisher had defaulted in underlying suit with community development corporation. Parties' right to money depended on equitable claims arising from original interest.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
