 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Alaska Trademark Shellfish, LLC v. State, Supreme Court No. S-10308, No. 5795,
SUPREME COURT OF ALASKA, April 16, 2004, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Court affirmed the denial of applications for aquatic farming permits; no provision of the Aquatic Farming Act empowered the Alaska Department of Fish and Game to grant exclusive rights to harvest and sell existing wild geoduck stocks.
|
|||||
| Johnson v. State, Court of Appeals No. A-8487, No. 1926,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, April 16, 2004, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where defendant was arrested for "minor on licensed premises" for being in a bar while under 21 years of age, police were permitted to search him for evidence of the crime. He could not suppress evidence of cocaine seized during the search.
|
|||||
| Kinzel v. Discovery Drilling, Inc., Supreme Court No. S-10190, No. 5796,
SUPREME COURT OF ALASKA, April 16, 2004, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where an employee was fired after filing an OSH complaint and a workers' compensation claim, the superior court erred in ruling against the employee on claims of retaliatory discharge, defamation, and intentional interference with contract rights.
|
|||||
| Schmitz v. Schmitz, Supreme Court No. S-10759, No. 5797,
SUPREME COURT OF ALASKA, April 16, 2004, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In a dissolution of marriage proceeding, a court did not err by awarding shared custody of the child when he reached his fifth birthday where the father showed a desire to provide for the child and a willingness to change to accommodate his needs.
|
|||||
| Barley v. Municipality of Anchorage, Court of Appeals No. A-8554, No. 4861,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, April 21, 2004, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where the jury found that defendant's injury did not justify driving with a revoked license, it could not have found him justified in driving while intoxicated; thus, any error in preventing him from raising a necessity defense was harmless.
|
|||||
| Lemon v. State, Court of Appeals No. A-8427, No. 4860,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, April 21, 2004, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where the prosecutor's closing argument was based on reasonable inferences from the evidence and did not allow the jury to engage in impermissible speculation, the trial court did not allow the State to present an impermissible final argument.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
