 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Barnica v. Kenai Peninsula Borough Sch. Dist., Supreme Court No. S-9155, No. 5562,
SUPREME COURT OF ALASKA, May 3, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where custodian's statutory remedies for gender discrimination were waived by reason of substitute remedies in collective bargaining agreement, failure to exhaust substitute remedies precluded discrimination suit.
|
|||||
| Brooks Range Exploration Co. v. Gordon, Supreme Court No. S-9600, No. 5561,
SUPREME COURT OF ALASKA, May 3, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where company sued shareholders for breach of contract, parties entered into a settlement agreement, company agreed to transport property unless it violated law, and the trial court enforced the agreement without a hearing, it was error to do so.
|
|||||
| Cook Inlet Keeper v. Alaska, Supreme Court No. S-9730, No. 5567,
SUPREME COURT OF ALASKA, May 3, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: State erred in issuing a consistency review determination that a proposed oil exploration program met all relevant coastal management program standards without considering wastewater discharge activities under State environmental protection laws.
|
|||||
| Hayes v. Municipality of Anchorage, Supreme Court No. S-10602, No. 5568,
SUPREME COURT OF ALASKA, May 3, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Superior court properly denied petitioner's motion to stop an election; petitioner's claim that candidate for municipal assembly seat failed to meet the one-year residency requirement for municipal candidates had no legal merit.
|
|||||
| State v. Malloy, Supreme Court No. S-9754, No. 5560,
SUPREME COURT OF ALASKA, May 3, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where statute did not empower court to impose a sentence harsher than the harshest sentence otherwise authorized by removing parole eligibility, the sentencing statute was constitutionally permissible.
|
|||||
| Tuttle v. State, Court of Appeals No. A-8077, No. 1801,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, May 3, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's sentence for first-degree robbery was vacated where the trial judge applied the wrong standard of proof in finding that he possessed a firearm during the robbery as a sentencing factor; the proper standard was beyond a reasonable doubt.
|
|||||
| Wells v. State, Supreme Court Nos. S-9538, S-9567, S-9568, No. 5559,
SUPREME COURT OF ALASKA, May 3, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: State was statutorily immune from liability in a tort suit by an injured driver for failure to install a guardrail at the downhill curve of a road because the decision whether to install a guardrail was a discretionary decision.
|
|||||
| Wright v. State, Court of Appeals No. A-7955, No. 1802,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, May 3, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's actions in robbing and severely beating female taxi driver justified finding that offenses of robbery and assault were committed with deliberate cruelty. Consecutive sentences were not excessive. Apprendi challenge was without merit.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
