 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| McNeil v. State, Court of Appeals No. A-9519, No. 5216,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, May 9, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Appellant was not entitled to credit against his jail sentence for the days he spent on electronic monitoring where the appellate court had recently rejected the argument that electronic monitoring on a bail release was equivalent to the restrictions placed on released prisoners and there was no reason to believe that the case was wrongly decided.
|
|||||
| O'Dell v. O'Dell, Supreme Court No. S-12097, No. 1277,
SUPREME COURT OF ALASKA, May 9, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A superior court's final order granting the father additional custody of the couple's child was affirmed where Alaska Stat. ¿ 25.20.110 did not apply, he was not a danger to the child even though he continued to have anger problems, and the evidence supported the finding that his anger management program had also addressed domestic violence issues.
|
|||||
| Renkel v. State, Court of Appeals No. A-9520, No. 5217,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, May 9, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A superior court did not err in denying appellant's Alaska R. Crim. P. 35(a) motion where requiring participation in a sexual offender treatment program was not an illegal sentence given judicial precedent upholding it as a valid probation condition and there was no claim that the superior court had not justified the probation condition.
|
|||||
| Winterrowd v. State, Court of Appeals No. A-9588, No. 5218,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, May 9, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Appellant was not denied his right to counsel where he failed to show any prejudice as a result of the court's failure to advise him of his right to counsel at his arraignment, he had made a competent and informed decision to represent himself at trial, and there were no changed circumstances warranting further inquiry at sentencing.
|
|||||
| Burns v. Burns, Supreme Court No. S-12154, No. 6123,
SUPREME COURT OF ALASKA, May 11, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In a dispute over a property settlement agreement, the extrinsic evidence offered by a former wife showed that the proper interpretation of the word "income" was an amount comparable to a former husband's usual dentistry salary; therefore, he was required to pay her spousal support five years based on his dentist salary, even if he retired.
|
|||||
| In re Landry, Supreme Court No. S-12566, Order No. 60,
SUPREME COURT OF ALASKA, May 11, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Uncle Joe's, Inc. v. L.M. Berry & Co., Supreme Court No. S-11516/S-11545,
SUPREME COURT OF ALASKA, May 15, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
