 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Cano v. Municipality of Anchorage, Court of Appeals No. A-7243, No. 4225,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, June 7, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Necessity and waiver or estoppel instructions were properly denied in trespass case; defendant had adequate alternatives to trespass in reporting an assault at cafe, and caf¿ employees objected each time he came onto property.
|
|||||
| Martin-Wilson v. State, Court of Appeals No. A-7354, No. 4226,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, June 7, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Imposition of composite 280-day sentence was affirmed, where record supported trial judge's findings that offender was a danger to community, and record showed trial judge considered offender's rehabilitation potential.
|
|||||
| Motta v. State, Court of Appeals No. A-7211, No. 4227,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, June 7, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Taint of earlier illegal confession was sufficiently attenuated to allow state to admit appellant's statement made two hours later, and there was no error in state's reference to appellant's testimony from his first trial.
|
|||||
| American Int'l Group v. Carriere, Supreme Court No. S-8921, No. 5281,
SUPREME COURT OF ALASKA, June 9, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Stopping payment on initial check reinstated appellant's payment obligation and created a new 14-day deadline for mailing replacement. Late payment penalty was properly imposed when new check was not mailed within 14 days.
|
|||||
| Coster v. Piekarski, Supreme Court No. S-8928, No. 5282,
SUPREME COURT OF ALASKA, June 9, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Court concluded that defendant bailee was not entitled to summary judgment on negligent bailment claim because there was a genuine fact dispute about whether the disappearance of the chattel was beyond defendant's control.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
