 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Alaska Legislative Council v. Knowles, Supreme Court Nos. S-8842, S-8851, No. 5395,
SUPREME COURT OF ALASKA, April 20, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Language in appropriations bill was not subject to a line-item veto, but effectively created a "mini-local hire law" for seafood marketing institute, and therefore violated the Alaska Constitution's Confinement Clause.
|
|||||
| Baker v. State, Court of Appeals No. A-7259, No. 1734,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, April 20, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In a criminal matter, the evidence presented at trial was sufficient to sustain his convictions for interference with official proceedings and witness tampering.
|
|||||
| M.W. v. Dep't of Health & Soc. Servs., Supreme Court No. S-9557, No. 5391,
SUPREME COURT OF ALASKA, April 20, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Court affirmed termination of father's parental rights to his daughter; father had only brief contact with the child since her birth, and made few attempts to contact social services department or work a treatment plan.
|
|||||
| Blackhurst v. State, Court of Appeals No. A-7654, No. 4383,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, April 25, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The circumstances of defendant's offense, and his proven failure to comply with probation, supported the superior court's decision to impose the three-year suspended sentence after revocation of defendant's probation.
|
|||||
| Butler v. State, Court of Appeals No. A-7376, No. 4382,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, April 25, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Even if government acted negligently in failing to preserve recording of incriminating statement defendant gave to police official two years before, defendant did not show that he was prejudiced by the loss of this evidence.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
