 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Alaskans for a Common Language v. Kritz, Supreme Court No. S-9167, No. 5284,
SUPREME COURT OF ALASKA, June 16, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A group that had helped to sponsor an "English only" ballot initiative was allowed to intervene as of right in a case challenging the initiative; but second group failed to show sufficient interest in the action.
|
|||||
| Edelman v. Edelman, Supreme Court No. S-8562, No. 5286,
SUPREME COURT OF ALASKA, June 16, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Former husband's compensatory damage claims arising from oil disaster were marital property, and punitive damages claims eventually awarded were to be allocated the same way as compensatory damages.
|
|||||
| S.S.M. v. CP Alaska, Supreme Court No. S-9381, No. 5285,
SUPREME COURT OF ALASKA, June 16, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Court held that while preference for placement of child with blood relative was inapplicable to situations where child had been placed for adoptive purposes, a dispute existed in the case about purposes of child's placement.
|
|||||
| Sosa v. State, Supreme Court No. S-8840, No. 5283,
SUPREME COURT OF ALASKA, June 16, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The implied consent statute precluded tests performed pursuant to search warrants as well as searches incident to arrest; therefore petitioner's refusal to submit to a blood test could not have constituted evidence tampering.
|
|||||
| Standifer v. State, Supreme Court No. S-8981, No. 5289,
SUPREME COURT OF ALASKA, June 16, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: District court should have made determination as to whether student loan should have been discharged for undue hardship. If discharged, district court would have been deprived of jurisdiction to continue default judgment.
|
|||||
| Trombley v. Starr-Wood Cardiac Group, Supreme Court No. S-8780, No. 5288,
SUPREME COURT OF ALASKA, June 16, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Patient's expert witnesses' testimony established triable issues of fact as to doctors' negligence in performing arterial bypass surgery and in post operative treatment, and made grant of summary judgment inappropriate.
|
|||||
| Valentino v. Cote, Supreme Court No. S-8971, No. 5287,
SUPREME COURT OF ALASKA, June 16, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Court held that appellee father demonstrated change in circumstances and that child custody modification would be in child's best interests, such that trial court did not abuse its discretion in granting custody to appellee.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
