 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Carlson v. State, Supreme Court No. S-12227,
SUPREME COURT OF ALASKA, May 24, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Walter J. v. State, Supreme Court No. S-12055, No. 1248,
SUPREME COURT OF ALASKA, May 24, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: State supreme court reversed decision terminating father's parental rights, pursuant to Alaska Stat. § 47.10.088, because superior court had not found that father, who lived in Texas, neglected child, and superior court improperly based its decision on fact that child's mother had not corrected conditions which led State to take custody of child.
|
|||||
| Marty A. v. Dep't of Health & Soc. Servs., Supreme Court No. S-11909, No. 1249,
SUPREME COURT OF ALASKA, May 31, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In a termination of parental rights matter, superior court did not err, pursuant to Alaska Stat. § 47.10.080, in terminating father's parental rights of daughter, who was an Alaska Native, because father's history of relapses into alcohol abuse showed that he had not remedied his problematic conduct that had placed his daughter at risk.
|
|||||
| Richards v. State, Court of Appeals No. A-8796, No. 5077,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, May 31, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In felony DUI matter, trial court properly denied motion to dismiss indictment because, even if grand jury heard prosecutor's reference to prior convictions, it was unlikely remarks were prejudicial. Defendant was not deprived of right to jury at sentencing because State used, under Alaska Stat. § 12.55.125(c)(21), prior convictions as aggravators.
|
|||||
| Stevens v. State, Court of Appeals No. A-09137,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, June 2, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Allen v. State, Supreme Court No. S-11527, No. 1251,
SUPREME COURT OF ALASKA, June 7, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In child support matter, superior court did not err in denying father's request, pursuant to Alaska R. Civ. P. 60(b)(3), to vacate judgment that denied request to retroactively modify child support order because findings supported decision; alleged error in calculating support did not, by itself, provide grounds for retroactive modification.
|
|||||
| Darcy K. v. State Dep't of Health & Soc. Servs., Supreme Court No. S-11538, No. 1250,
SUPREME COURT OF ALASKA, June 7, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where evidence supported find that freeing children for adoption or some other permanent placement would better serve their interests than being in chaotic environment their mother provided, that they needed closure with their mother, and parent who could recognize their emotional needs, termination of mother's rights was upheld.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
