 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Carter v. State, Court of Appeals No. A-7085, No. 4233,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, June 21, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Sexual assault victim's identification of defendant at showup was reliable, defendant's sentence was not excessive, and trial court did not err in restricting defendant's discretionary parole eligibility.
|
|||||
| Carter v. State, Court of Appeals No. A-7461, No. 4231,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, June 21, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Rejection of appellant's proposed statutory mitigating factor, that his offense was among the least serious within the definition of the offense because his firearm was not loaded, was not clearly erroneous.
|
|||||
| Gardner v. State, Court of Appeals No. A-6681, No. 4235,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, June 21, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Murder conviction was affirmed where tapes of wife's testimony at domestic violence hearings was inadmissible but error was harmless; all assertions of fact contained in the tapes were repeated by witnesses at murder trial.
|
|||||
| Haruch v. State, Court of Appeals No. A-7253, No. 4232,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, June 21, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where defendant cruelly inflicted horrific and life-threatening injuries on a pregnant woman while making repeated threats that he would kill her and her daughter, his enhanced presumptive term was not excessive.
|
|||||
| Jensen v. State, Court of Appeals No. A-7471, No. 4228,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, June 21, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's appeal of his sentence was dismissed, where trial judge imposed a term that did not exceed the minimum term specified in the plea agreement by more than two years of unsuspended imprisonment.
|
|||||
| Tocktoo v. State, Court of Appeals No. A-7113, No. 4234,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, June 21, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's 23-year sentence was justified by the need to protect the public where prior convictions and imprisonment for similar sexual crimes showed defendant was an offender who could not be deterred.
|
|||||
| Wagar v. State, Court of Appeals No. A-7160, No. 4229,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, June 21, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Controlled substance conviction was remanded for additional findings; glass vial discovered was not typical weapon, and specific and articulable facts were needed to support belief that unknown object was atypical weapon.
|
|||||
| Workman v. State, Court of Appeals No. A-7357, No. 4230,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, June 21, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's composite terms of four years and one month was not excessive, given his prior conduct and history. At 22, defendant had a string of offenses following a series of contacts with the juvenile system.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
