 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Bonham v. State, Court of Appeals No. A-8563, No. 4872,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, May 19, 2004, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Probation condition requiring defendant to pay a multimillion dollar restitution ordered in a federal criminal prosecution was improper, where the trial court had noted defendant's inability to pay.
|
|||||
| Brownlow v. Municipality of Anchorage, Court of Appeals No. A-8618, No. 4873,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, May 19, 2004, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A defendant's claim that his right to an independent sobriety test was violated because the arresting officer referred to a "blood test" was moot, because defendant was convicted for DUI under both the impairment and blood alcohol level theories.
|
|||||
| Mack v. State, Court of Appeals No. A-8245, No. 4871,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, May 19, 2004, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant was not denied due process of law when police sent boxes of murder victim's belongings to her mother in another state, as the State held the belongings until defendant's attorney gave State permission to release them to the mother.
|
|||||
| Hallam v. Alaska Airlines, Inc., Supreme Court No. S-10198, No. 5809,
SUPREME COURT OF ALASKA, May 21, 2004, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The superior court properly ruled in favor of an airline in a customer's suit for breach of contract, conversion, defamation, and claims under state antitrust law, based on the airline's standard ticket terms and policies.
|
|||||
| Sipary v. State, No. A-7813, No. 1933,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, May 21, 2004, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In an assault case, defendant failed to show that the prosecution materially mischaracterized his out-of-court statements; thus, to the extent the court failed to properly acknowledge the rule of completeness, any error was harmless.
|
|||||
| Huskey v. State, Court of Appeals No. A-8667, No. 4874,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, May 26, 2004, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Special condition of defendant's probation requiring him to submit to search by his probation officer for alcohol and controlled substances was deleted, where there was no evidence of nexus between his crimes and potential substance abuse problems.
|
|||||
| Lewis v. State, Court of Appeals No. A-8443, No. 4875,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, May 26, 2004, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Court did not err by denying defendant's motion to modify his sentence where the motion did not conform to the applicable rule, and it was barred by the law of the case as it had been determined in a prior appeal that his sentence was not illegal.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
