|
|
| |
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases —
for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case —
for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more.
lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
|
| |
State Courts -
Alaska - July 6 - July 13, 2005
|
| |
Gusty v. State, Court of Appeals No. A-8832, No. 4991,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, July 6, 2005, Decided
View this case - free
|
Overview: Given senseless nature of defendant's assault on victim, Alaska Stat. § 11.41.200(a)(3), the fact that he had perpetrated acts of domestic violence against victim in the past, and the fact that the shooting left victim disabled for life, under Alaska Stat. §§ 12.55.155, .125, his sentence of 12 years to serve was clearly not excessive or mistaken.
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Cook Schuhmann & Groseclose, Inc. v. Brown & Root, Inc., Supreme Court No. S-10922, No. 5921,
SUPREME COURT OF ALASKA, July 8, 2005, Decided
View this case - free
|
Overview: The holder of a first deed of trust did not violate Alaska Stat. §§ 34.20.080, 34.20.070(b) by halting a foreclosure sale to allow two prospective bidders time to obtain cash or cashier's checks in order to comply with the terms of the sale under a deed of trust, even though the offset bid was the only one received when the sale reconvened.
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Back to Top |
| |
|