LexisNexis
  
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!

Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!

While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.


   State Courts - Alaska - May 9, 2001

  
Roehl v. State, Court of Appeals No. A-7402, No. 4389, COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, May 9, 2001, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: Appellant had history of sexual abuse, showed no empathy for victim, and did not stop sexual assault when he realized victim was suffocating. Thus, trial court did not err in classifying him as a worst offender and sentencing him to 99 years.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Schroeder v. State, Court of Appeals No. A-7649, No. 4393, COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, May 9, 2001, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: Appeals court affirmed conviction of DWI. Arrested defendant's right to call a friend, relative, or attorney was triggered when arrestee arrived at police station. Police could not unreasonably interfere with the right once invoked.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Wagner v. State, Court of Appeals No. A-7718, No. 4397, COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, May 9, 2001, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: The circumstantial evidence supported the officer's conclusion that the glass jar he removed from appellant's pocket during a pat down search might be a weapon. Thus, the motion to suppress the jar was properly denied.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Back to Top
  

 www.lexisnexis.com  |  About LexisNexis  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Customer Support  |  Contact Us
  Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.