 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Department of Revenue, Child Support Enforcement Div. v. McCormick, Supreme Court No. S-9149, No. 5290,
SUPREME COURT OF ALASKA, June 23, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Motion to extend father's child support beyond age of majority was not a motion to modify the original support order, but to extend original order to a time period not covered, therefore no showing of changed circumstance was required.
|
|||||
| Office of Pub. Advocacy v. Superior Court, Second Judicial Dist., Supreme Court No. S-9508, No. 5291,
SUPREME COURT OF ALASKA, June 23, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Court had discretion to require Office of Public Advocacy (OPA) to continue to represent client despite finding that client was no longer eligible for appointed counsel. Order continuing OPA's appointment was affirmed.
|
|||||
| Shearer v. Municipality of Anchorage, Court of Appeals No. A-7467, No. 1678,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, June 23, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Imminent danger appellant posed to driving public did not cease simply because appellant pulled into driveway and exited vehicle; thus investigatory stop was valid and motion to suppress evidence was properly denied.
|
|||||
| Fredrichs v. State, Court of Appeals No. A-7233, No. 4238,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, June 28, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Appellant's conviction was upheld because there was probable cause to believe that appellant was driving while intoxicated and the court did not abuse its discretion when it refused to give the requested jury instruction.
|
|||||
| Howell v. State, Court of Appeals No. A-7269, No. 4237,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, June 28, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial judge was not clearly mistaken when he restricted second-degree murder defendant's parole eligibility until defendant served 10 years in prison.
|
|||||
| Ponder v. State, Court of Appeals No. A-7135, No. 4239,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, June 28, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Conviction for selling cocaine was affirmed. Appellant was allowed to thoroughly cross-examine, jury was fully instructed on how to evaluate witness bias, and admission of officer's testimony was not an abuse of discretion.
|
|||||
| Richardson v. State, Court of Appeals No. A-7174, No. 4240,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, June 28, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: There was no error in merging three counts of assault, arising from one incident, after conviction for sentencing purposes; severity of injuries inflicted was a proper aggravating factor, and record supported sentence.
|
|||||
| Schoenthaler v. State, Court of Appeals No. A-7101, No. 4236,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, June 28, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Appellant was arrested for driving while intoxicated without probable cause; thus evidence should have been suppressed. Seizure of blood and impoundment of appellant's vehicle were not authorized.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
