 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Coffland v. Coffland, Supreme Court No. S-8976, No. 5295,
SUPREME COURT OF ALASKA, June 30, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The imposition of discovery sanctions was affirmed. The valuation of marital property was reversed because it was error to fail to consider the two debts that appellee admitted were incurred during the marriage.
|
|||||
| In re Paine, Supreme Court No. S-09685, Order No. 35,
SUPREME COURT OF ALASKA, June 30, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Petition for suspension of lawyer denied and concomitant appeal from arbitration panel's award in a disciplinary proceeding unripe where trial court had not confirmed arbitration panel's award or entered judgment on award.
|
|||||
| P.G. & R. v. State, Supreme Court No. S-8062, S-8142, No. 5294,
SUPREME COURT OF ALASKA, June 30, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: State owed duty to disclose relevant information to prospective foster parents about foster child to be placed. Reasonable jury could find duty breached and breach caused foreseeable injuries to their children.
|
|||||
| State v. Shakespeare, Supreme Court No. S-8952, No. 5292,
SUPREME COURT OF ALASKA, June 30, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Court held that because appellant later consented to take breath test which was administered and could have led to probative results, appellant's license could not have been administratively revoked for earlier refusal.
|
|||||
| Arnett v. State, Court of Appeals No. A-7608, No. 4242,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, July 5, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Offender was not entitled to pursue a petition for post-conviction relief, where the petition was his third.
|
|||||
| Berhe v. Municipality of Anchorage, Court of Appeals No. A-7372, No. 4243,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, July 5, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Court held that since challenged testimony was admitted at defendant's trial to establish fact that a statement was made, rather than to prove truth of the matter asserted, the hearsay rule did not apply to such testimony.
|
|||||
| Dague v. State, Court of Appeals No. A-7125, No. 4241,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, July 5, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: After objection by prosecution, defendant was entitled to establish through voir dire the extent of defendant's witness's expertise and any whether proposed testimony on issues raised at trial were beyond the witness's expertise.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
