 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Clark v. State, Court of Appeals No. A-7343, No. 1688,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, September 22, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant, who was convicted of felony driving while intoxicated, was subject to presumptive sentencing as a third felony offender, as defendant had 31 prior criminal convictions, including 2 felonies.
|
|||||
| Semaken v. State, Court of Appeals No. A-7473, No. 1687,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, September 22, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Sex offender reporting statute did not preclude the promulgation of a general rule to govern the reporting deadline for all sex offenders, and statute was satisfied because of offender's reporting deadline at the time of initial registration.
|
|||||
| State v. Schnell, Supreme Court No. S-8313, No. 5314,
SUPREME COURT OF ALASKA, September 22, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Reversal of suspension of insurance license was improper where estoppel did not bar State from sanctioning appellee; however, case was remanded for reconsideration as sanctions decision was made without benefit of current relevant evidence.
|
|||||
| Alley v. State, Court of Appeals No. A-7721, No. 4281,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, September 27, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Criminal defendant failed to show that he was unable to meet within an attorney to discuss whether to challenge the judge assigned to his trial; thus, defendant's challenge to the judge's assignment was time barred.
|
|||||
| Flanagan v. Municipality of Anchorage, Court of Appeals No. A-7123, No. 4282,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, September 27, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Lack of American Sign Language interpreter for deaf drunk driving arrestee in the middle of the night did not violate the Americans with Disabilities Act, and in any event suppression not the remedy for such a violation.
|
|||||
| Harris v. State, Court of Appeals No. A-7353, No. 4280,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, September 27, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Appellant had a reasonable amount of time in which to contact an attorney prior to being given a breath test, thus motion to suppress was properly denied. Officer did not interfere with appellant's right to consult counsel.
|
|||||
| Roehl v. State, Court of Appeals No. A-7402, No. 4284,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, September 27, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In appeal of defendant's conviction for murder of his nephew and defendant's sentence, remand was appropriate when record was ambiguous as to whether defendant intended to kill the victim.
|
|||||
| Sanchez v. State, Court of Appeals No. A-7540, No. 4283,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ALASKA, September 27, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Motion to suppress evidence was properly denied. Police were authorized to search under the seat of appellant's vehicle incident to his arrest for driving with a suspended license.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
